Suppr超能文献

意大利的父母对疫苗的犹豫态度 - 一项全国性调查的结果。

Parental vaccine hesitancy in Italy - Results from a national survey.

机构信息

Communicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.

ASL-AL Regional Epidemiology Unit for Infectious Diseases, via Venezia 6, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2018 Feb 1;36(6):779-787. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.074. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Abstract

In Italy, in 2016, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate vaccine hesitancy and investigate its determinants among parents of children aged 16-36 months. Data on parental attitudes and beliefs about vaccinations were collected through a questionnaire administered online or self-administered at pediatricians' offices and nurseries. Parents were classified as pro-vaccine, vaccine-hesitant or anti-vaccine, according to self-reported tetanus and measles vaccination status of their child. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with hesitancy. A total of 3130 questionnaires were analysed: 83.7% of parents were pro-vaccine, 15.6% vaccine-hesitant and 0.7% anti-vaccine. Safety concerns are the main reported reason for refusing (38.1%) or interrupting (42.4%) vaccination. Anti-vaccine and hesitant parents are significantly more afraid than pro-vaccine parents of short-term (85.7 and 79.7% vs 60.4%) and long-term (95.2 and 72.3% vs 43.7%) vaccine adverse reactions. Most pro-vaccine and hesitant parents agree about the benefits of vaccinations. Family pediatricians are considered a reliable source of information by most pro-vaccine and hesitant parents (96.9 and 83.3% respectively), against 45% of anti-vaccine parents. The main factors associated with hesitancy were found to be: not having received from a paediatrician a recommendation to fully vaccinate their child [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.21, 95% CI: 2.14-4.79], having received discordant opinions on vaccinations (AOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.11-2.43), having met parents of children who experienced serious adverse reactions (AOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-2.15), and mainly using non-traditional medical treatments (AOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.31-3.19). Vaccine safety is perceived as a concern by all parents, although more so by hesitant and anti-vaccine parents. Similarly to pro-vaccine parents, hesitant parents consider vaccination an important prevention tool and trust their family pediatricians, suggesting that they could benefit from appropriate communication interventions. Training health professionals and providing homogenous information about vaccinations, in line with national recommendations, are crucial for responding to their concerns.

摘要

2016 年,在意大利,我们开展了一项横断面调查,以估计 16-36 月龄儿童父母的疫苗犹豫率,并调查其决定因素。通过在线问卷或在儿科医生办公室和托儿所进行自我管理收集关于父母对疫苗接种的态度和信念的数据。根据儿童破伤风和麻疹疫苗接种状况,父母被归类为赞成疫苗、疫苗犹豫或反疫苗。多变量逻辑回归用于调查与犹豫相关的因素。共分析了 3130 份问卷:83.7%的父母赞成疫苗,15.6%的父母对疫苗犹豫不决,0.7%的父母反疫苗。安全性问题是拒绝(38.1%)或中断(42.4%)疫苗接种的主要报告原因。反疫苗和犹豫不决的父母比赞成疫苗的父母更害怕短期(85.7%和 79.7%比 60.4%)和长期(95.2%和 72.3%比 43.7%)疫苗不良反应。大多数赞成疫苗和犹豫不决的父母都认为疫苗接种有好处。大多数赞成疫苗和犹豫不决的父母都认为家庭儿科医生是可靠的信息来源(分别为 96.9%和 83.3%),而只有 45%的反疫苗父母这样认为。与犹豫相关的主要因素有:未从儿科医生那里获得全面接种疫苗的建议[调整后的优势比(AOR):3.21,95%可信区间(CI):2.14-4.79]、收到关于疫苗接种的不一致意见(AOR:1.64,95% CI:1.11-2.43)、遇到经历过严重不良反应的儿童的父母(AOR:1.49,95% CI:1.03-2.15)和主要使用非传统医疗治疗(AOR:2.05,95% CI:1.31-3.19)。所有父母都认为疫苗安全是一个问题,尽管犹豫不决和反疫苗的父母更为关注。与赞成疫苗的父母一样,犹豫不决的父母也认为疫苗接种是一种重要的预防工具,并信任他们的家庭儿科医生,这表明他们可能受益于适当的沟通干预措施。培训卫生专业人员并按照国家建议提供一致的疫苗接种信息对于应对他们的担忧至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验