Menna Lucia Francesca, Santaniello Antonio, Gerardi Federica, Di Maggio Annamaria, Milan Graziella
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Studies of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Department of Fragility, ASL Napoli 1 Centro-CRIUV, Naples, Italy.
Psychogeriatrics. 2016 Jul;16(4):240-6. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12145. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) in elderly patients affected by Alzheimer's disease based on the formal reality orientation therapy (ROT) protocol.
Our study was carried out at an Alzheimer's centre for 6 months. A homogeneous sample (age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)) of 50 patients was selected at random and successively. Patients were divided into three groups: (i) 20 patients received a course of AAT (AAT group) based on the ROT protocol; (ii) 20 patients were engaged exclusively in activities based on the ROT group; and (iii) 10 patients (control group) participated in no stimulations. MMSE and GDS were administered at time 0 (T0 ) and time 1 (T1 ) to all three groups. Differences within groups between T0 and T1 for GDS and MMSE scores were analyzed by Student's t-test. Differences between group means were analyzed using an anova test with the Bonferroni-Dunn test for post-hoc comparisons.
Both the AAT group and ROT group had improved GDS scores and showed a slight improvement in terms of mood. On the GDS, the AAT group improved from 11.5 (T0 ) to 9.5 (T1 ), and the ROT group improved from 11.6 (T0 ) to 10.5 (T1 ). At the same time, a slight improvement in cognitive function, as measured by the MMSE, was observed. In the AAT group, mean MMSE was 20.2 at T0 and 21.5 at T1 , and in the ROT group, it was 19.9 at T0 and 20.0 at T1 . In the control group, the average values of both the GDS and MMSE remained unchanged. The Bonferroni-Dunn results showed statistically significant differences between groups, particularly between the AAT group and the other two (P < 0.001).
Pet therapy interventions based on the formal ROT protocol were effective and, compared to the ROT, provided encouraging and statistically significant results.
本研究旨在基于正式的现实定向疗法(ROT)方案,评估动物辅助疗法(AAT)对阿尔茨海默病老年患者的疗效。
我们的研究在一家阿尔茨海默病中心进行了6个月。随机且连续选取了50例患者组成一个同质样本(年龄、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、15项老年抑郁量表(GDS))。患者被分为三组:(i)20例患者接受了基于ROT方案的AAT疗程(AAT组);(ii)20例患者仅参与基于ROT的活动(ROT组);(iii)10例患者(对照组)未接受任何刺激。在时间0(T0)和时间1(T1)对所有三组患者进行MMSE和GDS评估。采用学生t检验分析GDS和MMSE评分在T0和T1组内的差异。使用方差分析及Bonferroni-Dunn检验进行组间均值差异分析以进行事后比较。
AAT组和ROT组的GDS评分均有所改善,情绪方面也有轻微改善。在GDS上,AAT组从11.5(T0)改善至9.5(T1),ROT组从11.6(T0)改善至10.5(T1)。同时,通过MMSE测量发现认知功能有轻微改善。在AAT组,T0时MMSE均值为20.2,T1时为21.5;在ROT组,T0时为19.9,T1时为20.0。对照组中,GDS和MMSE的平均值均未改变。Bonferroni-Dunn结果显示组间存在统计学显著差异,尤其是AAT组与其他两组之间(P < 0.001)。
基于正式ROT方案的宠物疗法干预是有效的,并且与ROT相比,提供了令人鼓舞且具有统计学显著意义的结果。