Lindén Magnus, Björklund Fredrik, Bäckström Martin
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Oct;59(5):547-552. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12463. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Self-reported level of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), the two facets of social dominance orientation (SDO-Dominance and SDO-Egalitarianism) and pro-torture attitudes were measured both in the immediate aftermath (terror salience, N = 152) of the terror attacks in Paris and Brussels and when terrorism was not salient (non-salience, N = 140). Results showed that RWA and pro-torture attitudes, but not SDO-Dominance and SDO-Egalitarianism, were significantly higher immediately after. Furthermore, RWA and SDO both predicted pro-torture attitudes more strongly under terror salience. We argue that the reason why RWA is higher under terror salience is a response to external threat, and that SDO-Dominance may be more clearly related to acceptance of torture and other human-rights violations, across context. Future research on the effects of terror-related events on sociopolitical and pro-torture attitudes should focus on person-situation interactions and also attempt to discriminate between trait and state aspects of authoritarianism.
在巴黎和布鲁塞尔恐怖袭击刚结束后(恐怖凸显,N = 152)以及恐怖主义不凸显时(非凸显,N = 140),对自我报告的右翼威权主义(RWA)水平、社会支配取向的两个方面(SDO-支配和SDO-平等主义)以及支持酷刑的态度进行了测量。结果表明,RWA和支持酷刑的态度在袭击刚结束后显著更高,但SDO-支配和SDO-平等主义并非如此。此外,在恐怖凸显情况下,RWA和SDO对支持酷刑态度的预测作用更强。我们认为,恐怖凸显时RWA更高的原因是对外部威胁的反应,并且SDO-支配可能在各种情况下与接受酷刑及其他侵犯人权行为的关联更为明显。未来关于恐怖相关事件对社会政治和支持酷刑态度影响的研究应关注个人与情境的相互作用,同时尝试区分威权主义的特质和状态方面。