• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investigating the Secondary Use of Clinical Research Data: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.临床研究数据二次利用的调查:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 6;12:e44875. doi: 10.2196/44875.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.患者和利益相关者对沙特阿拉伯通过移动健康应用程序收集的数据的隐私、安全和保密性的看法:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933.
6
Exploring the Pathways of Diabetes Foot Complications Treatment and Investigating Experiences From Frontline Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.探索糖尿病足并发症的治疗途径并调查一线医护人员的经验:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 24;13:e54852. doi: 10.2196/54852.
7
Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent and its Applications for Patient-Centric Research and Health Information Sharing: Protocol for an Integrative Review.基于区块链的动态同意及其在以患者为中心的研究和健康信息共享中的应用:一项综合综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 5;13:e50339. doi: 10.2196/50339.
8
Piloting the Inclusion of the Key Populations Unique Identifier Code in the South African Routine Health Information Management System: Protocol for a Multiphased Study.在南非常规卫生信息管理系统中纳入重点人群唯一标识符代码的试点研究:多阶段研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 6;13:e55092. doi: 10.2196/55092.
9
Co-Design of a Voice-Based Digital Health Solution to Monitor Persisting Symptoms Related to COVID-19 (UpcomingVoice Study): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.基于语音的数字健康解决方案与新冠病毒相关持续症状监测的协同设计(即将开展的语音研究):一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 19;12:e46103. doi: 10.2196/46103.
10
The Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Clinical Informatics Digital Hub: Protocol to Develop Extended COVID-19 Surveillance and Trial Platforms.牛津皇家全科医师学院临床信息学数字中心:开发扩展 COVID-19 监测和试验平台的方案。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 2;6(3):e19773. doi: 10.2196/19773.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Promise, Pitfalls, and Practical Pathways.医学教育中的人工智能:前景、陷阱与实践途径
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jun 14;16:1039-1046. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S523255. eCollection 2025.
2
Data sharing and reuse in clinical research: Are we there yet? A cross-sectional study on progress, challenges and opportunities in LMICs.临床研究中的数据共享与再利用:我们做到了吗?一项关于低收入和中等收入国家进展、挑战与机遇的横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;4(11):e0003392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003392. eCollection 2024.
3
Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy.公众对 2023 年美国国立卫生研究院数据共享政策背景下增加健康研究数据共享的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309161. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial intelligence for healthcare and medical education: a systematic review.用于医疗保健和医学教育的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):4820-4828. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The benefits of data sharing and ensuring open sources of systematic review data.数据共享和确保系统评价数据开源的好处。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):e582-e587. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac031.
2
Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review.纳入来自低收入和中等收入国家的参与者参与核心结局集制定:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):e049981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049981.
3
Individual notions of fair data sharing from the perspectives of Swiss stakeholders.瑞士利益相关者视角下的数据公平共享个体观念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06906-2.
4
Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review.临床试验个体参与者数据共享的现状、使用和影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e049228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049228.
5
Data Quality, Data Sharing, and Moving Artificial Intelligence Forward.数据质量、数据共享与推动人工智能发展
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119345. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19345.
6
A systematic literature review of researchers' and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data.对研究人员和医疗保健专业人员对健康管理和临床试验数据的二次使用和共享的态度的系统文献回顾。
Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;9(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01485-5.
7
Funders' data-sharing policies in therapeutic research: A survey of commercial and non-commercial funders.治疗性研究中资助者的数据共享政策:对商业和非商业资助者的调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0237464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237464. eCollection 2020.
8
From Raw Data to FAIR Data: The FAIRification Workflow for Health Research.从原始数据到 FAIR 数据:健康研究的 FAIR 化工作流程。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Jun;59(S 01):e21-e32. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713684. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
9
The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis.学术研究人员对数据共享和再利用的观点、视角和经验:元综合分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229182. eCollection 2020.
10
Clinical trial data sharing: here's the challenge.临床试验数据共享:挑战在于此。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 21;9(8):e032334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032334.

临床研究数据二次利用的调查:一项混合方法研究的方案

Investigating the Secondary Use of Clinical Research Data: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Waithira Naomi, Kestelyn Evelyne, Chotthanawathit Keitcheya, Osterrieder Anne, Mukaka Mavuto, Lang Trudie, Cheah Phaik Yeong

机构信息

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 6;12:e44875. doi: 10.2196/44875.

DOI:10.2196/44875
PMID:36877564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028503/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing emphasis to share patient data from clinical research has resulted in substantial investments in data repositories and infrastructure. However, it is unclear how shared data are used and whether anticipated benefits are being realized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to examine the current utilization of shared clinical research data sets and assess the effects on both scientific research and public health outcomes. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the factors that hinder or facilitate the ethical and efficient use of existing data based on the perspectives of data users.

METHODS

The study will utilize a mixed methods design, incorporating a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. The survey will involve at least 400 clinical researchers, while the in-depth interviews will include 20 to 40 participants who have utilized data from repositories or institutional data access committees. The survey will target a global sample, while the in-depth interviews will focus on individuals who have used data collected from low- and middle-income countries. Quantitative data will be summarized by using descriptive statistics, while multivariable analyses will be used to assess the relationships between variables. Qualitative data will be analyzed through thematic analysis, and the findings will be reported in accordance with the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines. The study received ethical approval from the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee in 2020 (reference number: 568-20).

RESULTS

The results of the analysis, including both quantitative data and qualitative data, will be available in 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of our study will offer crucial understanding into the current status of data reuse in clinical research, serving as a basis for guiding future endeavors to enhance the utilization of shared data for the betterment of public health outcomes and for scientific progress.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20210301006; https://tinyurl.com/2p9atzhr.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44875.

摘要

背景

日益强调共享临床研究中的患者数据,这促使人们对数据存储库和基础设施进行了大量投资。然而,尚不清楚共享数据是如何被使用的,以及预期的效益是否正在实现。

目的

我们研究的目的是考察共享临床研究数据集的当前利用情况,并评估其对科学研究和公共卫生成果的影响。此外,该研究旨在从数据使用者的角度确定阻碍或促进对现有数据进行道德和有效利用的因素。

方法

该研究将采用混合方法设计,包括横断面调查和深入访谈。调查将涉及至少400名临床研究人员,而深入访谈将包括20至40名使用过存储库数据或机构数据访问委员会数据的参与者。调查将针对全球样本,而深入访谈将聚焦于使用过从中低收入国家收集的数据的个人。定量数据将通过描述性统计进行汇总,而多变量分析将用于评估变量之间的关系。定性数据将通过主题分析进行分析,研究结果将按照COREQ(定性研究报告统一标准)指南进行报告。该研究于2020年获得牛津热带研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(参考编号:568 - 20)。

结果

包括定量数据和定性数据在内的分析结果将于2023年公布。

结论

我们研究的结果将为临床研究中数据再利用的现状提供关键认识,为指导未来努力提高共享数据的利用以改善公共卫生成果和推动科学进步奠定基础。

试验注册

泰国临床试验注册中心TCTR20210301006;https://tinyurl.com/2p9atzhr。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1 - 10.2196/44875。