Raine Daniel, Langley Philip, Shepherd Ewen, Lord Stephen, Murray Stephen, Murray Alan, Bourke John P
Department of Cardiology , Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
School of Engineering, University of Hull , Hull , UK.
Open Heart. 2015 Sep 10;2(1):e000302. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000302. eCollection 2015.
To assess the effect of catheter ablation on atrial fibrillation (AF) symptoms and quality of life (QoL).
Patients with AF scheduled for ablation were recruited. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)±linear ablation undertaken in patients in AF despite PVI. QoL and AF symptoms were assessed using SF-36 V2 and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaires before and 3 months after ablation. Change in QoL scores after ablation was correlated with clinical parameters and the extent of ablation. Magnitude of QoL change was compared between AFEQT and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores and correlated with arrhythmia outcome.
80 patients were studied. Summative and individual health scores for both AFEQT (51.5±22.0 vs 81.3±18.2; p<0.01) and SF-36 (PCS 43.3±10.5 vs 47.9±11.3; p<0.01 and MCS 45.0±11.5 vs 51.5±9.4; p<0.01) improved significantly in patients who maintained sinus rhythm after ablation, but not in those with recurrent AF. Improvement in AFEQT (25.4±19) was significantly greater than change in PCS (6.8±6.4; p<0.01) and MCS (8.5±7.9; p<0.01) scores and correlated more closely with arrhythmia outcome (AFEQT r=0.55; PCS r=0.26; MCS r=0.30).
Patients who maintained sinus rhythm after ablation had a significant improvement in AF symptoms and QoL; however, no improvement was observed in patients with recurrent AF. QoL change after ablation did not correlate with baseline clinical parameters or ablation strategy. AF specific QoL scales are more responsive to change and correlate better with ablation outcome.
评估导管消融对心房颤动(AF)症状及生活质量(QoL)的影响。
招募计划进行消融的AF患者。进行肺静脉隔离(PVI),对于尽管已行PVI但仍处于房颤状态的患者,进行碎裂心房电图(CFAE)±线性消融。在消融前及消融后3个月,使用SF - 36 V2和心房颤动对生活质量的影响(AFEQT)问卷评估生活质量和AF症状。消融后生活质量评分的变化与临床参数及消融范围相关。比较AFEQT与SF - 36身体成分总结(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS)评分之间生活质量变化的幅度,并与心律失常结局相关。
研究了80例患者。消融后维持窦性心律的患者,AFEQT(51.5±22.0对81.3±18.2;p<0.01)和SF - 36(PCS 43.3±10.5对47.9±11.3;p<0.01以及MCS 45.0±11.5对51.5±9.4;p<0.01)的总体和个体健康评分均显著改善,但房颤复发患者则未改善。AFEQT的改善(25.4±19)显著大于PCS(6.8±6.4;p<0.01)和MCS(8.5±7.9;p<0.01)评分的变化,且与心律失常结局的相关性更密切(AFEQT r = 0.55;PCS r = 0.26;MCS r = 0.30)。
消融后维持窦性心律的患者,AF症状和生活质量有显著改善;然而,房颤复发患者未观察到改善。消融后生活质量的变化与基线临床参数或消融策略无关。AF特异性生活质量量表对变化更敏感,且与消融结局的相关性更好。