van de Kar Mileen R D, van Steenbergen Gijs J, Vermeer Jasper R, van der Heijden Jeroen F, Balt Jippe F, Luermans Justin G L M, Blaauw Yuri, Medendorp Niki M, Veldman-Schulz Daniela N, Dekker Lukas R C, van Veghel Dennis
Heart Centre Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Mar 22;6(6):745-752. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.017. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL), necessitating effective therapeutic interventions such as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although PVI's success is often measured by freedom from arrhythmia, clinical practice emphasizes symptom freedom and patient comfort, as captured by QoL tools such as the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire.
This study investigates the association between baseline QoL, changes in QoL, and redo PVI, aiming to align patient-centered outcomes with clinical decision-making.
Data from 3336 AF patients undergoing first-time PVI between 2018 and 2021 in Dutch heart centers were analyzed. Patients with baseline and 1-year follow-up QoL scores were categorized into quartiles based on pre-PVI AFEQT scores, and redo PVI rates were assessed within 1 year.
Redo PVI was performed in 16.0% of patients within 1 year. Significant differences in left atrial volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and AF type were observed between redo and no-redo groups. Median AFEQT scores improved significantly: from 53.9 to 71.3 in redo patients and from 57.4 to 88.0 in others ( < .001). Higher baseline QoL scores correlated with lower redo rates: odds ratios for redo PVI were 0.93 (Q2, =.52), 0.74 (Q3, =.05), and 0.62 (Q4, =.001) compared with Q1. Redo PVI rates varied significantly between heart centers, reflecting practice variation.
Lower baseline QoL is associated with a higher likelihood of redo PVI, emphasizing the role of patient-reported outcomes in AF management. Integrating QoL assessments into routine practice may support individualized care, create risk stratification, and contribute to standardizing clinical decision-making.
心房颤动(AF)对生活质量(QoL)有显著影响,因此需要有效的治疗干预措施,如肺静脉隔离(PVI)。尽管PVI的成功通常以无心律失常来衡量,但临床实践强调症状缓解和患者舒适度,这可通过诸如心房颤动对生活质量影响(AFEQT)问卷等生活质量工具来体现。
本研究调查基线生活质量、生活质量变化与再次PVI之间的关联,旨在使以患者为中心的结果与临床决策相一致。
分析了2018年至2021年期间在荷兰心脏中心接受首次PVI的3336例AF患者的数据。根据PVI前的AFEQT评分,将具有基线和1年随访生活质量评分的患者分为四分位数,并评估1年内的再次PVI率。
16.0%的患者在1年内接受了再次PVI。再次PVI组和未再次PVI组在左心房容积指数、左心室射血分数和房颤类型方面存在显著差异。AFEQT评分中位数显著改善:再次PVI患者从53.9提高到71.3,其他患者从57.4提高到88.0(P<0.001)。较高的基线生活质量评分与较低的再次PVI率相关:与第一四分位数相比,再次PVI的优势比分别为0.93(第二四分位数,P=0.52)、0.74(第三四分位数,P=0.05)和0.62(第四四分位数,P=0.001)。不同心脏中心的再次PVI率差异显著,反映了实践差异。
较低的基线生活质量与再次PVI的较高可能性相关,强调了患者报告结果在房颤管理中的作用。将生活质量评估纳入常规实践可能有助于个性化护理、进行风险分层并有助于规范临床决策。