Ware Mark A, Wang Tongtong, Shapiro Stan, Collet Jean-Paul
Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Pain. 2015 Dec;16(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Cannabis is widely used as a self-management strategy by patients with a wide range of symptoms and diseases including chronic non-cancer pain. The safety of cannabis use for medical purposes has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a prospective cohort study to describe safety issues among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain. A standardized herbal cannabis product (12.5% tetrahydrocannabinol) was dispensed to eligible individuals for a 1-year period; controls were individuals with chronic pain from the same clinics who were not cannabis users. The primary outcome consisted of serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included pulmonary and neurocognitive function and standard hematology, biochemistry, renal, liver, and endocrine function. Secondary efficacy parameters included pain and other symptoms, mood, and quality of life. Two hundred and fifteen individuals with chronic pain were recruited to the cannabis group (141 current users and 58 ex-users) and 216 controls (chronic pain but no current cannabis use) from 7 clinics across Canada. The median daily cannabis dose was 2.5 g/d. There was no difference in risk of serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = .57-2.04) between groups. Medical cannabis users were at increased risk of non-serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.41-2.13); most were mild to moderate. There were no differences in secondary safety assessments. Quality-controlled herbal cannabis, when used by patients with experience of cannabis use as part of a monitored treatment program over 1 year, appears to have a reasonable safety profile. Longer-term monitoring for functional outcomes is needed.
The study was registered with www.controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN19449752).
This study evaluated the safety of cannabis use by patients with chronic pain over 1 year. The study found that there was a higher rate of adverse events among cannabis users compared with controls but not for serious adverse events at an average dose of 2.5 g herbal cannabis per day.
大麻被患有多种症状和疾病(包括慢性非癌性疼痛)的患者广泛用作一种自我管理策略。大麻用于医疗目的的安全性尚未得到系统评估。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以描述慢性非癌性疼痛患者中的安全问题。向符合条件的个体发放一种标准化的草药大麻产品(12.5% 四氢大麻酚),为期 1 年;对照组为来自同一诊所的慢性疼痛患者,他们不是大麻使用者。主要结局包括严重不良事件和非严重不良事件。次要安全结局包括肺和神经认知功能以及标准血液学、生物化学、肾脏、肝脏和内分泌功能。次要疗效参数包括疼痛和其他症状、情绪和生活质量。从加拿大各地的 7 家诊所招募了 215 名慢性疼痛患者进入大麻组(141 名当前使用者和 58 名既往使用者)以及 216 名对照组(慢性疼痛但当前不使用大麻)。大麻的日均剂量中位数为 2.5 克/天。两组之间严重不良事件的风险没有差异(调整后的发病率比 = 1.08,95% 置信区间 = 0.57 - 2.04)。医用大麻使用者发生非严重不良事件的风险增加(调整后的发病率比 = 1.73,95% 置信区间 = 1.41 - 2.13);大多数为轻度至中度。次要安全评估没有差异。当有大麻使用经验的患者在为期 1 年的监测治疗计划中使用质量控制的草药大麻时,似乎具有合理的安全性。需要对功能结局进行长期监测。
该研究在 www.controlled-trials.com(ISRCTN19449752)上注册。
本研究评估了慢性疼痛患者使用大麻 1 年的安全性。研究发现,与对照组相比,大麻使用者的不良事件发生率更高,但日均 2.5 克草药大麻的平均剂量下严重不良事件发生率无差异。