Johnson Brooks W, Strand Natalie H, Raynak John C, Jara Christian, Habtegiorgis Kisanet, Hand Brennan A, Hong Sang, Maloney Jillian A
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 20;13(3):530. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030530.
: Chronic pain remains a pervasive and challenging public health issue, often resistant to conventional treatments such as opioids, which carry substantial risks of dependency and adverse effects. Cannabinoids, bioactive compounds derived from the Cannabis sativa plant and their synthetic analogs, have emerged as a potential alternative for pain management, leveraging their interaction with the endocannabinoid system to modulate pain and inflammation. : The current, evolving literature regarding the history, efficacy, applications, and safety of cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain was reviewed and summarized to provide the most current review of cannabinoids. : Evidence suggests that cannabinoids provide moderate efficacy in managing neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, cancer-related pain, and multiple sclerosis-related spasticity. Patient-reported outcomes further indicate widespread perceptions of cannabinoids as a safer alternative to opioids, with potential opioid-sparing effects. However, the quality of existing evidence is limited by small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Regulatory barriers, including the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I substance in the United States, continue to hinder robust research and clinical integration. Moreover, the risks associated with cannabinoids, such as psychiatric effects, addiction potential, and drug interactions, necessitate cautious application. : Cannabinoids represent a promising, albeit complex, alternative for chronic pain management, particularly given the limitations and risks of traditional therapies such as opioids. However, significant deficiencies remain in the research. While smaller trials and systematic reviews indicate therapeutic potential, the quality of evidence is often low due to limited sample sizes, short study durations, and methodological inconsistencies. Large-scale, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are urgently needed to confirm efficacy and safety across diverse patient populations and pain etiologies.
慢性疼痛仍然是一个普遍且具有挑战性的公共卫生问题,通常对阿片类药物等传统治疗方法具有抗性,而阿片类药物存在依赖和不良反应的重大风险。大麻素是从大麻植物中提取的生物活性化合物及其合成类似物,已成为疼痛管理的一种潜在替代方法,利用它们与内源性大麻素系统的相互作用来调节疼痛和炎症。对当前关于大麻素治疗慢性疼痛的历史、疗效、应用和安全性的不断发展的文献进行了综述和总结,以提供对大麻素的最新综述。有证据表明,大麻素在管理神经性疼痛、纤维肌痛、癌症相关疼痛和多发性硬化相关痉挛方面具有中等疗效。患者报告的结果进一步表明,人们普遍认为大麻素是比阿片类药物更安全的替代品,具有潜在的阿片类药物节省作用。然而,现有证据的质量受到样本量小和方法不一致的限制。监管障碍,包括在美国将大麻归类为附表 I 物质,继续阻碍强有力的研究和临床整合。此外,与大麻素相关的风险,如精神影响、成瘾潜力和药物相互作用,需要谨慎应用。大麻素是慢性疼痛管理的一种有前景的替代方法,尽管很复杂,特别是考虑到阿片类药物等传统疗法的局限性和风险。然而,研究中仍存在重大缺陷。虽然较小规模的试验和系统评价表明有治疗潜力,但由于样本量有限、研究持续时间短和方法不一致,证据质量往往较低。迫切需要进行大规模、长期随访的随机对照试验,以确认不同患者群体和疼痛病因的疗效和安全性。