Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Medical Microbiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5ND, UK.
Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Medical Microbiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5ND, UK.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Nov;46(5):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
The chemotherapeutic options against NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections are limited and therefore combination therapy is gaining momentum to counter the secondary resistance and potential suboptimal efficacy of monotherapy. Colistin and fosfomycin are two separate classes of antimicrobial agents that act on bacterial cells by different mechanisms. Hence, there is a potential for both synergy and antagonism. In this study, the antibacterial effects (ABEs) of colistin and fosfomycin were systematically investigated by time-kill curve studies over 48 h as well as in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model over 96 h against six well characterised strains of NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae (three isolates resistant and three susceptible to fosfomycin) at a standard inoculum of 10(6)CFU/mL. Clinically achievable free serum concentrations of colistin sulphate and fosfomycin were used. In a single-chamber in vitro model, peak/trough concentrations (C(max)/C(min)) and the half-life (t(1/2)) for fosfomycin (250/40 mg/L and 2.7 h, respectively) and colistin sulphate (3.0/0.75 mg/L and 4 h, respectively) were used, along with a growth control. ABEs were measured by the decrease in viable bacterial counts (log kill), area under the bacterial kill curve (AUBKC) and population analysis profile (PAP). The combination of colistin and fosfomycin compared with either agent alone achieved increased bacterial killing and decreased the chance of emergence of resistance. Also, the ABEs of the combination were sustained for a longer duration and were evident both against fosfomycin-sensitive and -resistant strains. This study provides important information and support for the role of combination therapy against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options.
针对产 NDM-1 的肠杆菌科细菌感染的化疗选择有限,因此联合治疗正在兴起,以对抗单药治疗的继发耐药性和潜在疗效不佳。多粘菌素和磷霉素是两种不同类别的抗菌药物,通过不同的机制作用于细菌细胞。因此,两者具有协同作用和拮抗作用的潜力。在这项研究中,通过 48 小时的时间杀伤曲线研究以及 96 小时的体外药代动力学模型,系统研究了多粘菌素硫酸盐和磷霉素对 6 株经过充分特征鉴定的产 NDM-1 的肠杆菌科细菌(3 株对磷霉素耐药,3 株对磷霉素敏感)的抗菌作用(ABEs),标准接种量为 10(6)CFU/mL。使用了临床可达到的游离血清多粘菌素硫酸盐和磷霉素浓度。在单个室体外模型中,使用了磷霉素(250/40 mg/L 和 2.7 h,分别为峰/谷浓度(C(max)/C(min))和半衰期(t(1/2))和多粘菌素硫酸盐(3.0/0.75 mg/L 和 4 h,分别为峰/谷浓度(C(max)/C(min))和半衰期(t(1/2))以及生长对照。ABEs 通过活菌计数的减少(对数杀灭)、细菌杀伤曲线下面积(AUBKC)和种群分析谱(PAP)来测量。与单独使用任何一种药物相比,多粘菌素和磷霉素的联合使用可增加细菌杀伤,并降低耐药性出现的机会。此外,联合用药的 ABEs 持续时间更长,对磷霉素敏感和耐药菌株均有效。这项研究为联合治疗在治疗选择有限的多重耐药性革兰氏阴性菌方面的作用提供了重要信息和支持。