Ro Annie, Bostean Georgiana
UC Irvine, Program in Public Health, Anteater Instruction and Research Building (AIRB), Room 2036, 653 E. Peltason Road, Irvine, CA 92697-3957, USA.
Chapman University, Schmid College of Science & Technology, Wilkinson College of Humanities & Social Sciences, 1 University Drive, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
Studies find that longer-term immigrants have higher body mass index (BMI) than their more recently arrived counterparts. Most interpretations of these health patterns by duration of U.S. residence rely on theories of immigrant integration; they posit that with increasing time in the United States, immigrants incorporate economically, socially, and culturally into aspects of U.S. society, and that these changes impact health. Few studies empirically examine whether these aspects of integration are indeed mediators of the association between duration of U.S. stay and BMI, and if their patterns differ across immigrant subgroups. This study examines data from the National Latino and Asian American Survey, using path analytic methods to simultaneously test six hypothesized mediators between duration and BMI: household income, English language ability, ethnic identity, family cohesion, acculturative stress and discrimination for both Latino and Asian immigrants, stratified by gender. We find little evidence for an association between duration and BMI for either Latino or Asian men. For women, duration and BMI have a significant and positive relationship, although the pathways differ between the two ethnic groups. For Latina women, household income and acculturative stress are significant indirect pathways, although they work in opposing directions. For Asian women, English proficiency and discrimination are significant indirect pathways. Our findings reveal complex pathways between duration and BMI that vary by ethnicity and gender and highlight limitations in the negative acculturation theory, which suggests that exposure to the United States should have a net negative impact on health. In contrast, our findings suggest that not all groups show declining health with longer duration, as measured by BMI, and that integration processes do not always translate into health differences in the expected directions. Future research on duration patterns may need to consider alternative explanations beyond incorporation-based processes, such as cross-national health theories or age, period, cohort effects.
研究发现,长期移民的体重指数(BMI)高于近期抵达的移民。大多数根据在美国居住时长对这些健康模式的解读都依赖于移民融入理论;这些理论假定,随着在美国居住时间的增加,移民在经济、社会和文化方面融入美国社会,而这些变化会影响健康。很少有研究实证检验这些融入方面是否确实是在美国停留时长与BMI之间关联的中介因素,以及它们在不同移民亚群体中的模式是否存在差异。本研究分析了“全国拉丁裔和亚裔美国人调查”的数据,采用路径分析方法同时检验在美国停留时长与BMI之间的六个假设中介因素:家庭收入、英语语言能力、族群认同、家庭凝聚力、文化适应压力以及针对拉丁裔和亚裔移民的歧视,并按性别进行分层。我们发现,对于拉丁裔或亚裔男性,几乎没有证据表明在美国停留时长与BMI之间存在关联。对于女性而言,在美国停留时长与BMI存在显著的正相关关系,不过两个族裔群体的路径有所不同。对于拉丁裔女性,家庭收入和文化适应压力是显著的间接路径,尽管它们的作用方向相反。对于亚裔女性,英语熟练程度和歧视是显著的间接路径。我们的研究结果揭示了在美国停留时长与BMI之间因种族和性别而异的复杂路径,并凸显了负面文化适应理论的局限性,该理论认为接触美国社会应对健康产生净负面影响。相比之下,我们的研究结果表明,并非所有群体随着停留时间延长健康状况都会下降(以BMI衡量),而且融入过程并不总是会按预期方向转化为健康差异。未来关于停留时长模式的研究可能需要考虑基于融入过程之外的其他解释,比如跨国健康理论或年龄、时期、队列效应。