Suppr超能文献

开发用于单侧唇腭裂修复美学效果的视觉评分图表。

Developing a visual rating chart for the esthetic outcome of unilateral cleft lip and palate repair.

作者信息

Adeola A Olusanya, Oladimeji A Akadiri

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan-Jun;5(1):55-61. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.161060.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Aesthetic impairment is a major concern for the cleft lip/palate patient. Thus, auditing of postsurgical esthetic outcome needs to be further explored as till date no universally accepted protocol exists. The study objective was to propose a new visual rating chart (VRC) for the aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of 200 repaired clefts, the common esthetic deficiencies were identified, categorized and ranked in the order of severity. A chart of the illustrative diagram with textual description of the defects was produced and used as a basis for rating outcome by two groups of raters (familiar raters and recruited raters). Intra- and inter-raters reliability was estimated using Cohen's kappa statistics and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Comparison between mean group coefficient was achieved with Kendall's correlation coefficient of concordance.

RESULTS

The intra- and inter-rater reliability for familiar raters was found to be strong with kappa values range of 0.80-0.87 (P < 0.001). Similarly, inter-raters' reliability by recruited judges was very strong using ICC at both single (0.768) and average measures (0.982).

CONCLUSION

The VRC is a reliable tool for assessing the esthetic outcome of CLP repairs.

摘要

引言

美观受损是唇腭裂患者主要关心的问题。因此,由于目前尚无普遍接受的方案,术后美学效果的评估有待进一步探索。本研究的目的是为唇腭裂(CLP)手术的美学效果提出一种新的视觉评分表(VRC)。

材料与方法

回顾性分析200例修复后的腭裂病例,确定常见的美学缺陷,进行分类并按严重程度排序。绘制了带有缺陷文字描述的示意图,并作为两组评分者(熟悉的评分者和招募的评分者)对结果进行评分的依据。使用科恩kappa统计量和组内相关系数(ICC)估计评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性。通过肯德尔和谐相关系数对平均组系数进行比较。

结果

熟悉的评分者的评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性很强,kappa值范围为0.80 - 0.87(P < 0.001)。同样,招募的评分者在单次测量(0.768)和平均测量(0.982)时使用ICC的评分者之间的可靠性也非常强。

结论

VRC是评估CLP修复美学效果的可靠工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c32/4555950/460e7e87ac43/AMS-5-55-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验