Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe R
Clin Prev Dent. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):12-6.
Several chlorhexidine mouthwashes are now produced commercially but which differ in concentration and regimen of use. This study compared a 0.1% formulation with a 0.2% formulation for effects on plaque reformation, development of gingivitis, and tooth staining. The investigation was a single blind cross-over design employing 14 volunteers with a high standard of oral hygiene and gingival health. The rinses were used twice a day during two 19 day periods using the regiments recommended by each manufacturer and as a replacement for mechanical oral hygiene practices. A baseline zero plaque score was obtained at the beginning of each period with a 16-day washout allowed between the two periods. Parameters of gingival inflammation were scored at baseline and then, together with plaque and tooth stain scores, at 12 and 19 days. All indices of gingival inflammation and plaque were significantly increased at days 12 and 19 with the 0.1% mouthwash formulation. Little evidence of tooth staining was noted with the 0.1% formulation. The 0.2% mouthwash produced the characteristic staining noted with most chlorhexidine preparations. Based on the findings of this study and a previous laboratory investigation, it is concluded that the reduced antiplaque activity of the 0.1% formulation resulted from inactivation of chlorhexidine within the product rather than from the reduced dose of chlorhexidine used.
目前市场上有几种洗必泰漱口水在售,但它们在浓度和使用方法上有所不同。本研究比较了0.1%配方和0.2%配方对牙菌斑再形成、牙龈炎发展及牙齿染色的影响。该调查采用单盲交叉设计,招募了14名口腔卫生和牙龈健康水平较高的志愿者。在两个19天的时间段内,按照各制造商推荐的方案,每天使用漱口水两次,以替代机械口腔卫生措施。每个时间段开始时获得基线零菌斑评分,两个时间段之间留出16天的洗脱期。在基线时对牙龈炎症参数进行评分,然后在第12天和第19天,连同菌斑和牙齿染色评分一起进行评分。使用0.1%漱口水配方时,在第12天和第19天,牙龈炎症和菌斑的所有指标均显著增加。0.1%配方几乎没有牙齿染色的迹象。0.2%漱口水出现了大多数洗必泰制剂常见的染色现象。基于本研究结果和先前的实验室调查,得出结论:0.1%配方抗牙菌斑活性降低是由于产品中洗必泰失活,而非所用洗必泰剂量减少。