Yan Chengfei, Grinter Sam Z, Merideth Benjamin Ryan, Ma Zhiwei, Zou Xiaoqin
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Department of Biochemistry, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1013-21. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00504. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
In this study, we developed two iterative knowledge-based scoring functions, ITScore_pdbbind(rigid) and ITScore_pdbbind(flex), using rigid decoy structures and flexible decoy structures, respectively, that were generated from the protein-ligand complexes in the refined set of PDBbind 2012. These two scoring functions were evaluated using the 2013 and 2014 CSAR benchmarks. The results were compared with the results of two other scoring functions, the Vina scoring function and ITScore, the scoring function that we previously developed from rigid decoy structures for a smaller set of protein-ligand complexes. A graph-based method was developed to evaluate the root-mean-square deviation between two conformations of the same ligand with different atom names and orders due to different file preparations, and the program is freely available. Our study showed that the two new scoring functions developed from the larger training set yielded significantly improved performance in binding mode predictions. For binding affinity predictions, all four scoring functions showed protein-dependent performance. We suggest the development of protein-family-dependent scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction.
在本研究中,我们分别使用从PDBbind 2012精炼集中的蛋白质-配体复合物生成的刚性诱饵结构和柔性诱饵结构,开发了两种基于迭代知识的评分函数,即ITScore_pdbbind(刚性)和ITScore_pdbbind(柔性)。使用2013年和2014年的CSAR基准对这两种评分函数进行了评估。将结果与其他两种评分函数的结果进行了比较,这两种评分函数分别是Vina评分函数和ITScore,ITScore是我们之前从刚性诱饵结构为较小的蛋白质-配体复合物集开发的评分函数。开发了一种基于图形的方法来评估由于不同的文件准备而具有不同原子名称和顺序的同一配体的两种构象之间的均方根偏差,该程序可免费获取。我们的研究表明,从更大的训练集中开发的这两种新评分函数在结合模式预测方面表现出显著提高的性能。对于结合亲和力预测,所有四种评分函数都表现出蛋白质依赖性性能。我们建议开发蛋白质家族依赖性评分函数以进行准确的结合亲和力预测。