Hannon Peggy A, Helfrich Christian D, Chan K Gary, Allen Claire L, Hammerback Kristen, Kohn Marlana J, Parrish Amanda T, Weiner Bryan J, Harris Jeffrey R
1 Health Promotion Research Center (a CDC Prevention Research Center), Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
2 Northwest Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jan;31(1):67-75. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141204-QUAN-604. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
To develop a theory-based questionnaire to assess readiness for change in small workplaces adopting wellness programs.
In developing our scale, we first tested items via "think-aloud" interviews. We tested the revised items in a cross-sectional quantitative telephone survey.
The study setting comprised small workplaces (20-250 employees) in low-wage industries.
Decision-makers representing small workplaces in King County, Washington (think-aloud interviews, n = 9), and the United States (telephone survey, n = 201) served as study subjects.
We generated items for each construct in Weiner's theory of organizational readiness for change. We also measured workplace characteristics and current implementation of workplace wellness programs.
We assessed reliability by coefficient alpha for each of the readiness questionnaire subscales. We tested the association of all subscales with employers' current implementation of wellness policies, programs, and communications, and conducted a path analysis to test the associations in the theory of organizational readiness to change.
Each of the readiness subscales exhibited acceptable internal reliability (coefficient alpha range, .75-.88) and was positively associated with wellness program implementation ( p < .05). The path analysis was consistent with the theory of organizational readiness to change, except change efficacy did not predict change-related effort.
We developed a new questionnaire to assess small workplaces' readiness to adopt and implement evidence-based wellness programs. Our findings also provide empirical validation of Weiner's theory of readiness for change.
开发一份基于理论的问卷,以评估采用健康计划的小型工作场所的变革准备情况。
在制定我们的量表时,我们首先通过“出声思考”访谈对项目进行测试。我们在横断面定量电话调查中测试了修订后的项目。
研究设置包括低薪行业的小型工作场所(20 - 250名员工)。
华盛顿州金县小型工作场所的决策者(出声思考访谈,n = 9)以及美国的决策者(电话调查,n = 201)作为研究对象。
我们根据韦纳的组织变革准备理论为每个构念生成项目。我们还测量了工作场所特征以及工作场所健康计划的当前实施情况。
我们通过每个变革准备情况问卷子量表的α系数评估信度。我们测试了所有子量表与雇主当前健康政策、计划和沟通实施情况的关联,并进行了路径分析以检验组织变革准备理论中的关联。
每个变革准备情况子量表都表现出可接受的内部信度(α系数范围为0.75 - 0.88),并且与健康计划的实施呈正相关(p < 0.05)。路径分析与组织变革准备理论一致,但变革效能并未预测与变革相关的努力。
我们开发了一份新问卷,以评估小型工作场所采用和实施循证健康计划的准备情况。我们的研究结果还为韦纳的变革准备理论提供了实证验证。