Su Yan Ru, Chiusa Manuel, Brittain Evan, Hemnes Anna R, Absi Tarek S, Lim Chee Chew, Di Salvo Thomas G
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Pulm Circ. 2015 Sep;5(3):481-97. doi: 10.1086/682219.
Little is known about the right ventricular (RV) proteome in human heart failure (HF), including possible differences compared to the left ventricular (LV) proteome. We used 2-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (pH: 4-7, 10-150 kDa), followed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, to compare the RV and LV proteomes in 12 explanted human hearts. We used Western blotting and multiple-reaction monitoring for protein verification and RNA sequencing for messenger RNA and protein expression correlation. In all 12 hearts, the right ventricles (RVs) demonstrated differential expression of 11 proteins relative to the left ventricles (LVs), including lesser expression of CRYM, TPM1, CLU, TXNL1, and COQ9 and greater expression of TNNI3, SAAI, ERP29, ACTN2, HSPB2, and NDUFS3. Principal-components analysis did not suggest RV-versus-LV proteome partitioning. In the nonischemic RVs (n = 6), 7 proteins were differentially expressed relative to the ischemic RVs (n = 6), including increased expression of CRYM, B7Z964, desmin, ANXA5, and MIME and decreased expression of SERPINA1 and ANT3. Principal-components analysis demonstrated partitioning of the nonischemic and ischemic RV proteomes, and gene ontology analysis identified differences in hemostasis and atherosclerosis-associated networks. There were no proteomic differences between RVs with echocardiographic dysfunction (n = 8) and those with normal function (n = 4). Messenger RNA and protein expression did not correlate consistently, suggesting a major role for RV posttranscriptional protein expression regulation. Differences in contractile, cytoskeletal, metabolic, signaling, and survival pathways exist between the RV and the LV in HF and may be related to the underlying HF etiology and differential posttranscriptional regulation.
关于人类心力衰竭(HF)时右心室(RV)蛋白质组的情况,包括与左心室(LV)蛋白质组相比可能存在的差异,目前所知甚少。我们采用二维差异凝胶电泳(pH:4 - 7,10 - 150 kDa),随后进行液相色谱串联质谱分析,以比较12颗移植的人类心脏的右心室和左心室蛋白质组。我们使用蛋白质免疫印迹法和多反应监测进行蛋白质验证,并通过RNA测序分析信使RNA与蛋白质表达的相关性。在所有12颗心脏中,右心室相对于左心室显示出11种蛋白质的差异表达,包括CRY M、TPM1、CLU、TXNL1和COQ9表达较低,而TNNI3、SAAI、ERP29、ACTN2、HSPB2和NDUFS3表达较高。主成分分析未显示右心室与左心室蛋白质组的区分。在非缺血性右心室(n = 6)中,相对于缺血性右心室(n = 6)有7种蛋白质差异表达,包括CRY M、B7Z964、结蛋白、膜联蛋白A5和MIME表达增加,而丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂A1和ANT3表达降低。主成分分析显示非缺血性和缺血性右心室蛋白质组的区分,基因本体分析确定了止血和动脉粥样硬化相关网络的差异。超声心动图功能障碍的右心室(n = 8)与功能正常的右心室(n = 4)之间没有蛋白质组差异。信使RNA与蛋白质表达并非始终相关,提示右心室转录后蛋白质表达调控起主要作用。心力衰竭时右心室和左心室在收缩、细胞骨架、代谢、信号传导和生存途径方面存在差异,可能与潜在的心力衰竭病因及转录后调控差异有关。