• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像对垂体腺瘤一致性的预测

Prediction of Consistency of Pituitary Adenomas by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

作者信息

Smith Kyle A, Leever John D, Chamoun Roukoz B

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.

Department of Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Sep;76(5):340-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549005. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1549005
PMID:26401474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4569502/
Abstract

Objective Pituitary adenomas are typically soft. The prevalence of fibrous adenomas is ∼ 5 to 13%. Firm tumors are difficult to remove by curettage or suction. Predicting fibrous adenomas by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is typically difficult and unreliable. We propose a new prediction method based on MR T2-sequence intensity. Methods The MRIs of 36 consecutive patients with nonsecreting macroadenomas were evaluated preoperatively by a blinded radiologist. Using an MR T2-weighted sequence, regions of interest were sampled from the adenoma and cerebellar peduncle, and the ratio was calculated. Intraoperatively, tumors were graded prospectively for their consistency by the operating surgeon. Results There were 28 soft and 6 fibrous tumors. Unpaired t test for these ratios was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0240; 95% confidence interval, -0.8229 to -0.06207). Mean values for soft tumors were found to be 1.918 (standard error of the mean [SEM] = 0.08212); firm tumors, 1.475 (SEM = 0.1179). Soft tumors were associated with ratios > 1.5 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 66.7%); firm tumors were associated with ratios < 1.8 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 42.9%). Conclusion Fibrous adenomas are typically diagnosed intraoperatively. However, their resection can be technically challenging. Using T2 intensity ratios on routine preoperative MRI allows identification of these challenging cases. The surgeon can then be better prepared for the surgical resection.

摘要

目的

垂体腺瘤通常质地柔软。纤维腺瘤的患病率约为5%至13%。质地坚硬的肿瘤难以通过刮除术或抽吸术切除。通过磁共振(MR)成像预测纤维腺瘤通常困难且不可靠。我们提出一种基于MR T2序列强度的新预测方法。方法:由一位不知情的放射科医生对36例连续的非分泌性大腺瘤患者的术前MRI进行评估。使用MR T2加权序列,从腺瘤和小脑脚采集感兴趣区域,并计算比值。术中由手术医生对肿瘤的质地进行前瞻性分级。结果:有28例质地柔软的肿瘤和6例纤维瘤。发现这些比值的非配对t检验具有统计学意义(p < 0.0240;95%置信区间,-0.8229至-0.06207)。质地柔软肿瘤的平均值为1.918(平均标准误[SEM] = 0.08212);质地坚硬肿瘤的平均值为1.475(SEM = 0.1179)。质地柔软的肿瘤与比值>1.5相关(敏感性100%;特异性66.7%);质地坚硬的肿瘤与比值<1.8相关(敏感性100%;特异性42.9%)。结论:纤维腺瘤通常在术中诊断。然而,其切除在技术上可能具有挑战性。在术前常规MRI上使用T2强度比值可识别这些具有挑战性的病例。然后外科医生可以为手术切除做好更好的准备。

相似文献

1
Prediction of Consistency of Pituitary Adenomas by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.磁共振成像对垂体腺瘤一致性的预测
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Sep;76(5):340-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549005. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
Tumor to Cerebellar Peduncle T2-Weighted Imaging Intensity Ratio Fails to Predict Pituitary Adenoma Consistency.肿瘤与小脑脚T2加权成像强度比无法预测垂体腺瘤的质地。
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Jun;80(3):252-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668516. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Meningioma consistency prediction utilizing tumor to cerebellar peduncle intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences: TCTI ratio.利用 T2 加权磁共振成像序列中肿瘤与小脑脑桥强度比预测脑膜瘤质地:TCTI 比值。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):242-248. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152329. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
The Utility of Using Preoperative MRI as a Predictor for Intraoperative Pituitary Adenoma Consistency and Surgical Resection Technique.术前磁共振成像作为预测垂体腺瘤术中质地及手术切除技术的效用
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Dec;81(6):651-658. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694049. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
5
The role of preoperative MRI in endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal hypophysectomy of pituitary adenoma.术前磁共振成像在垂体腺瘤经鼻内镜经蝶窦垂体切除术中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Apr;281(4):1961-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08472-9. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Predicting Consistency of Meningioma by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过磁共振成像预测脑膜瘤的一致性
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Jun;76(3):225-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1543965. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Relationship Between Pituitary Adenoma Consistency and Extent of Resection Based on Tumor/Cerebellar Peduncle T2-Weighted Imaging Intensity (TCTI) Ratio of the Point on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Corresponding to the Residual Point on Postoperative MRI.基于术前磁共振成像(MRI)对应术后 MRI 残瘤点的肿瘤/脑桥 T2 加权成像强度(TCTI)比值,探讨垂体腺瘤硬度与切除程度的关系。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 6;26:e919565. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919565.
8
Technical considerations of transsphenoidal removal of fibrous pituitary adenomas and evaluation of collagen content and subtype in the adenomas.经蝶窦切除纤维性垂体腺瘤的技术考量及腺瘤中胶原含量与亚型的评估
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2002 May;42(5):202-12; discussion 213. doi: 10.2176/nmc.42.202.
9
To assess the ability of MRI to predict consistency of pituitary macroadenomas.评估磁共振成像(MRI)预测垂体大腺瘤一致性的能力。
Br J Neurosurg. 2006 Oct;20(5):324-6. doi: 10.1080/02688690601000717.
10
Is it really possible to predict the consistency of a pituitary adenoma preoperatively?术前真的有可能预测垂体腺瘤的质地吗?
Neurochirurgie. 2017 Dec;63(6):453-457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI-based interpretable clinicoradiological and radiomics machine learning model for preoperative prediction of pituitary macroadenomas consistency: a dual-center study.基于MRI的可解释性临床放射学和放射组学机器学习模型用于垂体大腺瘤一致性的术前预测:一项双中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03698-8.
2
The role of preoperative MRI in endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal hypophysectomy of pituitary adenoma.术前磁共振成像在垂体腺瘤经鼻内镜经蝶窦垂体切除术中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Apr;281(4):1961-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08472-9. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Diffusion-weighted imaging does not seem to be a predictor of consistency in pituitary adenomas.弥散加权成像似乎不能预测垂体腺瘤的一致性。
Pituitary. 2024 Apr;27(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01377-6. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Radiomic Analysis in Pituitary Tumors: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.垂体瘤的放射组学分析:当前认知与未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 7;13(2):336. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020336.
5
Otolaryngology Considerations of Pituitary Surgery: What an Endocrinologist Should Know.垂体手术的耳鼻喉科考量:内分泌科医生应了解的内容。
J Endocr Soc. 2023 Apr 27;7(7):bvad058. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad058. eCollection 2023 Jun 5.
6
Pituitary adenoma consistency affects postoperative hormone function: a retrospective study.垂体腺瘤的质地影响术后激素功能:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01334-1.
7
Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma.垂体瘤影像学:第 5 版 WHO 分类更新解读-第 1 部分。垂体神经内分泌肿瘤(PitNET)/垂体腺瘤。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):789-806. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
8
A Scoring System That Predicts Difficult Lipoma Resection: Logistic Regression and Tenfold Cross-Validation Analysis.一种预测脂肪瘤切除困难的评分系统:逻辑回归与十折交叉验证分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;12(11):2575-2587. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00820-z. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
Application of "mosiac sign" on T2-WI in predicting the consistency of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.T2加权成像上“马赛克征”在预测垂体神经内分泌肿瘤一致性中的应用
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 26;9:922626. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.922626. eCollection 2022.
10
The Utility of Using Preoperative MRI as a Predictor for Intraoperative Pituitary Adenoma Consistency and Surgical Resection Technique.术前磁共振成像作为预测垂体腺瘤术中质地及手术切除技术的效用
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Dec;81(6):651-658. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694049. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas.垂体腺瘤 PROPELLER 扩散加权成像和表观扩散系数的作用评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.023. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
2
To assess the ability of MRI to predict consistency of pituitary macroadenomas.评估磁共振成像(MRI)预测垂体大腺瘤一致性的能力。
Br J Neurosurg. 2006 Oct;20(5):324-6. doi: 10.1080/02688690601000717.
3
Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--initial experience.垂体大腺瘤:利用扩散加权磁共振成像进行术前质地评估的初步经验
Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):223-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2383042204. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
4
Comparison of growth hormone-producing and non-growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: imaging characteristics and pathologic correlation.生长激素分泌型与非生长激素分泌型垂体腺瘤的比较:影像学特征与病理相关性
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):533-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282020695. Epub 2003 Jun 20.
5
Technical considerations of transsphenoidal removal of fibrous pituitary adenomas and evaluation of collagen content and subtype in the adenomas.经蝶窦切除纤维性垂体腺瘤的技术考量及腺瘤中胶原含量与亚型的评估
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2002 May;42(5):202-12; discussion 213. doi: 10.2176/nmc.42.202.
6
MRI prediction of fibrous pituitary adenomas.垂体纤维腺瘤的磁共振成像预测
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1007/s007010050179.
7
Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: MR characteristics and pre- and postoperative evaluation.生长激素分泌型垂体腺瘤:磁共振成像特征及术前术后评估
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1993 Feb;33(2):81-5. doi: 10.2176/nmc.33.81.