Wahidi Momen M, Herth Felix, Yasufuku Kazuhiro, Shepherd Ray Wesley, Yarmus Lonny, Chawla Mohit, Lamb Carla, Casey Kenneth R, Patel Sheena, Silvestri Gerard A, Feller-Kopman David J
Duke University Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Durham, NC.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chest. 2016 Mar;149(3):816-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1216. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was introduced in the last decade, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lung masses. The many publications produced about EBUS-TBNA have led to a better understanding of the performance characteristics of this procedure. The goal of this document was to examine the current literature on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA as they relate to patient, technology, and proceduralist factors to provide evidence-based and expert guidance to clinicians.
Rigorous methodology has been applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed specific topics on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and well-recognized document evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract meaningful data, and to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion.
Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature on 15 PICO questions related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA resulted in 12 statements: 7 evidence-based graded recommendations and 5 ungraded consensus-based statements. Three questions did not have sufficient evidence to generate a statement.
Evidence on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA varies in strength but is satisfactory in certain areas to guide clinicians on the best conditions to perform EBUS-guided tissue sampling. Additional research is needed to enhance our knowledge regarding the optimal performance of this effective procedure.
支气管内超声(EBUS)于过去十年间被引入,可对纵隔和肺门结构以及支气管旁肺部肿块进行经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)的实时引导。关于EBUS-TBNA的众多出版物使人们对该操作的性能特征有了更好的理解。本文的目的是研究当前关于EBUS-TBNA技术方面的文献,这些方面涉及患者、技术和操作医生因素,以便为临床医生提供基于证据的专家指导。
采用了严格的方法来提供一份可靠的基于证据的指南和专家小组报告。一组经批准的小组成员使用PICO(人群、干预措施、对照和结果)格式制定了关键临床问题,这些问题涉及EBUS-TBNA技术方面的特定主题。系统检索了MEDLINE(通过PubMed)和Cochrane图书馆中的相关文献,并辅以手工检索。对参考文献进行筛选以确定是否纳入,同时使用公认的文献评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量,提取有意义的数据,并对支持每项推荐或建议的证据水平进行分级。
我们对与EBUS-TBNA技术方面相关的15个PICO问题的文献进行系统综述和批判性分析后,得出了12条陈述:7条基于证据的分级推荐和5条基于共识的未分级陈述。有3个问题没有足够的证据来形成陈述。
关于EBUS-TBNA技术方面的证据强度各不相同,但在某些领域足以指导临床医生了解进行EBUS引导下组织采样的最佳条件。需要进行更多研究以增强我们对这一有效操作最佳性能的认识。