Choi Young-Eun, Cha Young Ryun, Lee Kyoung-Min, Kim Hyun Jin, Yoon Chang-Hwan
Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Exp Mol Med. 2015 Sep 25;47(9):e186. doi: 10.1038/emm.2015.60.
Proangiogenic cells (PACs) display surface markers and secrete angiogenic factors similar to those used by myelomonocytic cells, but, unlike myelomonocytic cells, PACs enhance neovascularization activity in experimental ischemic diseases. This study was performed to reveal the differential neovascularization activities of PACs compared with those of myelomonocytic cells. We cultured PACs and CD14(+)-derived macrophages (Macs) for 7 days. Most of the surface markers and cytokines in the two cell types were alike; the exceptions were KDR, β8 integrin, interleukin-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Unlike Macs, PACs significantly enhanced mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transmigration. PACs and Macs increased neovascularization activity in an in vitro co-culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and MSCs and in an in vivo cotransplantation in Matrigel. However, the use of Macs resulted in inappropriately dilated and leaky vessels, whereas the use of PACs did not. We induced critical hindlimb ischemia in nude mice, and then transplanted PACs, Macs or vehicle into the mice. We obtained laser Doppler perfusion images weekly. At 2 weeks, mice treated with PACs showed significantly enhanced perfusion recovery in contrast to those treated with Macs. After day 7, when cells were depleted using a suicidal gene, viral thymidine kinase, to induce apoptosis of the cells in vivo by ganciclovir administration, we found that the improved perfusion was significantly abrogated in the PAC-treated group, whereas perfusion was not changed in the Mac-treated group. PACs caused an increase in healthy new vessels in in vitro and in vivo models of angiogenesis and enhanced long-term functional neovascularization activity in the hindlimb ischemia model, whereas Macs did not. Nevertheless, the angiogenic potential and long-term functional results for a specific cell type should be validated to confirm effectiveness and safety of the cell type for use in therapeutic angiogenesis procedures.
促血管生成细胞(PACs)表达的表面标志物以及分泌的血管生成因子与骨髓单核细胞相似,但是,与骨髓单核细胞不同的是,PACs可增强实验性缺血性疾病中的新生血管形成活性。本研究旨在揭示PACs与骨髓单核细胞在新生血管形成活性方面的差异。我们将PACs和CD14(+)来源的巨噬细胞(Macs)培养7天。两种细胞类型的大多数表面标志物和细胞因子相似;例外的是KDR、β8整合素、白细胞介素-8和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1。与Macs不同,PACs可显著增强间充质干细胞(MSC)的迁移。在人脐静脉内皮细胞和MSC的体外共培养以及基质胶体内的体内共移植实验中,PACs和Macs均增加了新生血管形成活性。然而,使用Macs会导致血管过度扩张和渗漏,而使用PACs则不会。我们诱导裸鼠发生严重的后肢缺血,然后将PACs、Macs或赋形剂移植到小鼠体内。我们每周获取激光多普勒灌注图像。在第2周时,与接受Macs治疗的小鼠相比,接受PACs治疗小鼠的灌注恢复显著增强。在第7天之后,当使用自杀基因(病毒胸苷激酶)通过给予更昔洛韦在体内诱导细胞凋亡以耗尽细胞时,我们发现接受PACs治疗的组中改善的灌注显著消除了,而接受Macs治疗的组中灌注没有变化。在体外和体内血管生成模型中,PACs可增加健康新血管的数量,并在后肢缺血模型中增强长期功能性新生血管形成活性,而Macs则不能。然而,对于特定细胞类型的血管生成潜力和长期功能结果,应进行验证以确认该细胞类型用于治疗性血管生成程序的有效性和安全性。