Ma Qing, Vaida Florin, Wong Jenna, Sanders Chelsea A, Kao Yu-ting, Croteau David, Clifford David B, Collier Ann C, Gelman Benjamin B, Marra Christina M, McArthur Justin C, Morgello Susan, Simpson David M, Heaton Robert K, Grant Igor, Letendre Scott L
University of California, San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University at Buffalo, 315 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
J Neurovirol. 2016 Apr;22(2):170-8. doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0382-7. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Neurocognitive (NC) complications continue to afflict a substantial proportion of HIV-infected people taking effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). One contributing mechanism for this is antiretroviral neurotoxicity. Efavirenz (EFV) is associated with short-term central nervous system (CNS) toxicity, but less is known about its long-term effects. Our objective was to compare NC functioning with long-term use of EFV to that of a comparator, lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r), in a cohort of well-characterized adults. Four hundred forty-five patients were selected from the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) cohort based on their use of either EFV (n = 272, mean duration 17.9 months) or LPV/r (n = 173, mean duration 16.4 months) and the lack of severe NC comorbidities. All patients had undergone standardized comprehensive NC testing. Univariable and multivariable analyses to predict NC outcomes were performed. Compared with LPV/r users, EFV users were more likely to be taking their first ART regimen (p < 0.001), were less likely to have AIDS (p < 0.001) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection (p < 0.05), had higher CD4+ T cell nadirs (p < 0.001), had lower peak (p < 0.001) and current (p < 0.001) plasma HIV RNA levels, and were less likely to have detectable HIV RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (p < 0.001). Overall, EFV users had worse speed of information processing (p = 0.04), verbal fluency (p = 0.03), and working memory (p = 0.03). An interaction with HCV serostatus was present: Overall among HCV seronegatives (n = 329), EFV users performed poorly, whereas among HCV seropositives (n = 116), LPV/r users had overall worse performance. In the subgroup with undetectable plasma HIV RNA (n = 269), EFV users had worse speed of information processing (p = 0.02) and executive functioning (p = 0.03). Substantial differences exist between EFV and LPV/r users in this observational cohort, possibly because of channeling by clinicians who may have prescribed LPV/r to more severely ill patients or as second-line therapy. Despite these differences, EFV users had worse functioning in several cognitive abilities. A potentially important interaction was identified that could indicate that the NC consequences of specific antiretroviral drugs may differ based on HCV coinfection. The complexity of these data is substantial, and findings would best be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial.
神经认知(NC)并发症持续困扰着相当一部分正在接受有效抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的HIV感染者。造成这种情况的一个原因是抗逆转录病毒药物的神经毒性。依非韦伦(EFV)与短期中枢神经系统(CNS)毒性有关,但对其长期影响了解较少。我们的目标是在一组特征明确的成年人中,比较长期使用EFV与对照药物洛匹那韦-利托那韦(LPV/r)对NC功能的影响。从CNS HIV抗逆转录病毒治疗效果研究(CHARTER)队列中选取了445名患者,这些患者要么使用EFV(n = 272,平均使用时间17.9个月),要么使用LPV/r(n = 173,平均使用时间16.4个月),且没有严重的NC合并症。所有患者都接受了标准化的全面NC测试。进行了单变量和多变量分析以预测NC结果。与使用LPV/r的患者相比,使用EFV的患者更有可能正在接受他们的首个ART方案(p < 0.001),患艾滋病(p < 0.001)或丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)合并感染(p < 0.05)的可能性更小,CD4 + T细胞最低点更高(p < 0.001),血浆HIV RNA峰值(p < 0.001)和当前水平(p < 0.001)更低,并且脑脊液(CSF)中检测到HIV RNA的可能性更小(p < 0.001)。总体而言,使用EFV的患者在信息处理速度(p = 0.04)、语言流畅性(p = 0.03)和工作记忆(p = 0.03)方面表现更差。存在与HCV血清学状态的相互作用:总体而言,在HCV血清阴性者(n = 329)中,使用EFV的患者表现较差,而在HCV血清阳性者(n = 116)中,使用LPV/r的患者总体表现更差。在血浆HIV RNA检测不到的亚组(n = 269)中,使用EFV的患者在信息处理速度(p = 0.02)和执行功能(p = 0.03)方面表现更差。在这个观察性队列中,EFV和LPV/r使用者之间存在显著差异,这可能是因为临床医生可能将LPV/r开给了病情更严重的患者或作为二线治疗。尽管存在这些差异,使用EFV的患者在几种认知能力方面表现更差。确定了一个潜在的重要相互作用,这可能表明特定抗逆转录病毒药物的NC后果可能因HCV合并感染而有所不同。这些数据的复杂性很高,最好在随机临床试验中对研究结果进行验证。