Suppr超能文献

国家外科质量改进计划风险计算器不能充分对临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者的风险进行分层。

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not adequately stratify risk for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Samson Pamela, Robinson Clifford G, Bradley Jeffrey, Lee Audrey, Broderick Stephen, Kreisel Daniel, Krupnick A Sasha, Patterson G Alexander, Puri Varun, Meyers Bryan F, Crabtree Traves

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, Mo.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, Mo.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):697-705.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.058. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to validate the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Calculator in stratifying risk estimates for patients who received surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery (N = 279) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (N = 206) from 2009 to 2012 was performed. NSQIP complication risk estimates were calculated for both surgical and stereotactic body radiation therapy cases using the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. NSQIP complication risk estimates were compared as continuous variables and by quartile ranges.

RESULTS

Compared with patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge resection, patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy were older, had larger tumors, had lower forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in 1 second and diffusing capacity of the lungs (DLCO) for carbon monoxide values, had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, had higher rates of dyspnea, and had higher NSQIP serious complication risk estimates (all P < .05). Compared with patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy had similar disparities, along with higher Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE) scores comorbidity scores, higher rates of cardiac comorbidities, and worse functional status (all P < .05). Variables associated with receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment, rather than wedge resection, included increasing age, higher Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE)-27 comorbidity score, dyspnea status, and decreasing FEV1 in 1 second and DLCO for carbon monoxide, but NSQIP serious complication risk score. In addition, surgical patients' actual serious complication rate (16.6% vs 8.8%) and pneumonia rate (6.0% vs 3.2%) were significantly higher than the NSQIP risk calculator predicted (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not effectively classify or stratify risk in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Continued efforts are needed to assess risk in this population and develop more tailored treatment decision aids.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)风险计算器在对接受手术或立体定向体部放射治疗的临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者进行风险分层评估时的有效性。

方法

对2009年至2012年期间接受手术(n = 279)或立体定向体部放射治疗(n = 206)的临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性分析。使用NSQIP手术风险计算器计算手术和立体定向体部放射治疗病例的NSQIP并发症风险评估值。将NSQIP并发症风险评估值作为连续变量并按四分位数范围进行比较。

结果

与接受电视辅助胸腔镜楔形切除术的患者相比,接受立体定向体部放射治疗的患者年龄更大、肿瘤更大、一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)更低、美国麻醉医师协会评分更高、呼吸困难发生率更高、NSQIP严重并发症风险评估值更高(所有P < 0.05)。与接受电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的患者相比,接受立体定向体部放射治疗的患者存在类似差异,同时成人合并症评估-27(ACE)评分更高、合并症评分更高、心脏合并症发生率更高、功能状态更差(所有P < 0.05)。与接受楔形切除术相比,与接受立体定向体部放射治疗相关的变量包括年龄增加、成人合并症评估(ACE)-27合并症评分更高、呼吸困难状态以及一秒用力呼气量和肺一氧化碳弥散量降低,但不包括NSQIP严重并发症风险评分。此外,手术患者的实际严重并发症发生率(16.6%对8.8%)和肺炎发生率(6.0%对3.2%)显著高于NSQIP风险计算器预测值(所有P < 0.05)。

结论

国家外科质量改进计划风险计算器不能有效地对I期非小细胞肺癌患者的风险进行分类或分层。需要继续努力评估该人群的风险并开发更具针对性的治疗决策辅助工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验