Kumar Uttam
Centre of Biomedical Research, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226014, India.
Cogn Process. 2016 Feb;17(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Our perception about the representation and processing of concrete and abstract concepts is based on the fact that concrete words are highly imagined and remembered faster than abstract words. In order to explain the processing differences between abstract and concrete concepts, various theories have been proposed, yet there is no unanimous consensus about its neural implication. The present study investigated the processing of concrete and abstract words during an orthography judgment task (implicit semantic processing) using functional magnetic resonance imaging to validate the involvement of the neural regions. Relative to non-words, both abstract and concrete words show activation in the regions of bilateral hemisphere previously associated with semantic processing. The common areas (conjunction analyses) observed for abstract and concrete words are bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45), left superior parietal (BA 7), left fusiform gyrus and bilateral middle occipital. The additional areas for abstract words were noticed in bilateral superior temporal and bilateral middle temporal region, whereas no distinct region was noticed for concrete words. This suggests that words with abstract concepts recruit additional language regions in the brain.
我们对于具体概念和抽象概念的表征与处理的认知,是基于这样一个事实:具体词汇具有高度的可想象性,并且比抽象词汇记忆得更快。为了解释抽象概念和具体概念在处理上的差异,人们提出了各种理论,但对于其神经学意义尚无一致的共识。本研究使用功能磁共振成像,在一项正字法判断任务(内隐语义处理)中,对具体词汇和抽象词汇的处理进行了研究,以验证神经区域的参与情况。相对于非单词,抽象词汇和具体词汇在先前与语义处理相关的双侧半球区域均显示出激活。抽象词汇和具体词汇共同的区域(联合分析)为双侧额下回(BA 44/45)、左侧顶上小叶(BA 7)、左侧梭状回以及双侧枕中回。抽象词汇额外激活的区域位于双侧颞上回和双侧颞中回,而具体词汇未发现明显的独特区域。这表明具有抽象概念的词汇会在大脑中调用额外的语言区域。