Dudley Susan A
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
AoB Plants. 2015 Sep 25;7:plv113. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv113.
The study of plant behaviour will be aided by conceptual approaches and terminology for cooperation, altruism and helping. The plant literature has a rich discussion of helping between species while the animal literature has an extensive and somewhat contentious discussion of within-species helping. Here, I identify and synthesize concepts, terminology and some practical methodology for speaking about helping in plant populations and measuring the costs and benefits. I use Lehmann and Keller's (2006) classification scheme for animal helping and McIntire and Fajardo's (2014) synthesis of facilitation to provide starting points for classifying the mechanisms of how and why organisms help each other. Contextual theory is discussed as a mechanism for understanding and measuring the fitness consequences of helping. I synthesize helping into four categories. The act of helping can be costly to the helper. If the helper gains indirect fitness by helping relatives but loses direct fitness, this is altruism, and it only occurs within species. Helpers can exchange costly help, which is called mutualism when between species, and reciprocation when within a species. The act of helping can directly benefit the helper as well as the recipient, either as an epiphenomenon resulting from behaviours under natural selection for other reasons, or because the helper is creating a mutual benefit, such as satiating predators or supporting a mutualism. Facilitation between species by stress amelioration, creation of novel ecosystems and habitat complexity often meets the definition of epiphenomenon helping. Within species, this kind of helping is called by-product mutualism. If the helping is under selection to create a mutual benefit shared by others, between species this is facilitation with service sharing or access to resources and within species, direct benefits by mutual benefits. These classifications provide a clear starting point for addressing the subject of helping behaviours.
合作、利他主义和帮助行为的概念方法及术语将有助于植物行为的研究。植物文献中对物种间的帮助行为有丰富的讨论,而动物文献中对物种内的帮助行为有广泛且颇具争议的讨论。在此,我识别并综合了一些概念、术语以及一些实用方法,用于探讨植物群体中的帮助行为并衡量其成本与收益。我借鉴了莱曼和凯勒(2006年)对动物帮助行为的分类方案以及麦金太尔和法哈多(2014年)对促进作用的综合研究,以此为基础对生物体相互帮助的方式及原因的机制进行分类。情境理论被作为一种理解和衡量帮助行为适应性后果的机制进行讨论。我将帮助行为归纳为四类。帮助行为对帮助者而言可能是有代价的。如果帮助者通过帮助亲属获得间接适应性但失去直接适应性,这就是利他主义,且仅发生在物种内部。帮助者可以交换代价高昂的帮助行为,物种间的这种行为称为互利共生,物种内的则称为互惠。帮助行为可以直接使帮助者和接受者受益,这要么是自然选择下其他行为产生的附带现象,要么是因为帮助者创造了互利关系,比如使捕食者饱腹或支持互利共生关系。通过缓解压力、创造新生态系统和栖息地复杂性来实现的物种间促进作用,通常符合附带现象帮助行为的定义。在物种内部,这种帮助行为被称为副产品互利共生。如果帮助行为是为了创造他人共享的互利关系而受到选择,那么物种间的这种行为就是具有服务共享或资源获取功能的促进作用,物种内的则是互利共赢带来的直接益处。这些分类为研究帮助行为这一主题提供了清晰的起点。