Jason Leonard A, Zinn Marcie L, Zinn Mark A
Center for Community Research, DePaul University, 990 W. Fullerton Ave., Chicago, Illinois, 60614-3504 United States.
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13(5):701-34. doi: 10.2174/1570159x13666150928105725.
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) continues to cause significant morbidity worldwide with an estimated one million cases in the United States. Hurdles to establishing consensus to achieve accurate evaluation of patients with ME continue, fueled by poor agreement about case definitions, slow progress in development of standardized diagnostic approaches, and issues surrounding research priorities. Because there are other medical problems, such as early MS and Parkinson's Disease, which have some similar clinical presentations, it is critical to accurately diagnose ME to make a differential diagnosis. In this article, we explore and summarize advances in the physiological and neurological approaches to understanding, diagnosing, and treating ME. We identify key areas and approaches to elucidate the core and secondary symptom clusters in ME so as to provide some practical suggestions in evaluation of ME for clinicians and researchers. This review, therefore, represents a synthesis of key discussions in the literature, and has important implications for a better understanding of ME, its biological markers, and diagnostic criteria. There is a clear need for more longitudinal studies in this area with larger data sets, which correct for multiple testing.
肌痛性脑脊髓炎(ME)在全球范围内仍造成大量发病,在美国估计有100万例。由于病例定义的一致性差、标准化诊断方法的开发进展缓慢以及研究重点相关问题,在就准确评估ME患者达成共识方面仍存在障碍。因为还有其他一些医学问题,如早期多发性硬化症和帕金森病,有一些相似的临床表现,所以准确诊断ME以进行鉴别诊断至关重要。在本文中,我们探讨并总结了在理解、诊断和治疗ME的生理学和神经学方法方面取得的进展。我们确定了阐明ME核心和次要症状群的关键领域和方法,以便为临床医生和研究人员在评估ME时提供一些实用建议。因此,本综述代表了文献中关键讨论的综合,对于更好地理解ME、其生物标志物和诊断标准具有重要意义。显然需要在该领域进行更多具有更大数据集的纵向研究,并对多重检验进行校正。