• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“弹出式”治理:为联盟制定内部治理框架:以英国万人基因组计划为例

'Pop-Up' Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K.

作者信息

Kaye Jane, Muddyman Dawn, Smee Carol, Kennedy Karen, Bell Jessica

机构信息

HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Population Health, HeLEX - Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9
PMID:26412243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4584211/
Abstract

Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project's governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called 'pop-up' governance. 'Pop-up' because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how 'pop-up' governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance.

摘要

信息技术的创新推动了新型研究网络和治理形式的发展。这在基因组学领域表现得很明显,越来越多的研究由大型跨学科联盟开展,专注于特定的研究工作。英国十万人基因组计划(UK10K)就是一个人类基因组学联盟的例子,该联盟获得资助以深入了解罕见病的基因组学,并从生成的序列数据中建立一个社区资源。为了按照商定的时间表实现其目标,UK10K项目建立了一个内部治理系统,以加快研究进程并处理出现的复杂问题。该项目的治理结构体现了一种名为“弹出式”治理的新型网络治理形式。之所以称为“弹出式”,是因为:它组建迅速,在特定时期存在,为特定目的而设计,并且在项目完成后易于解散。在本文中,我们以UK10K为例,描述“弹出式”治理在实际中的运作方式,以及在这种新型网络治理中如何使用关系型、层级型和契约型治理机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/521f/4584211/eed68263732a/40504_2015_28_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/521f/4584211/eed68263732a/40504_2015_28_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/521f/4584211/eed68263732a/40504_2015_28_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
'Pop-Up' Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K.“弹出式”治理:为联盟制定内部治理框架:以英国万人基因组计划为例
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
2
Managing clinically significant findings in research: the UK10K example.管理研究中具有临床意义的发现:以英国十万人基因组计划为例。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Sep;22(9):1100-4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.290. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Caldicott and healthcare information governance, from an acute trust's information governance manager's perspective.从一家急症信托机构的信息治理经理的视角看卡尔迪科特与医疗保健信息治理
J (Inst Health Rec Inf Manag). 2009 Mar;50(1):36-7.
4
Do governance choices matter in health care networks?: an exploratory configuration study of health care networks.治理选择在医疗保健网络中重要吗?:对医疗保健网络的探索性配置研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 24;13:229. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-229.
5
Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.研究联盟的治理:在欧洲实施负责任的研究与创新所面临的挑战。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Nov 16;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00109-z.
6
Access Governance for Biobanks: The Case of the BioSHaRE-EU Cohorts.生物样本库的访问管理:以BioSHaRE-EU队列为例。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):201-6. doi: 10.1089/bio.2015.0124. Epub 2016 May 16.
7
NHS research governance procedures.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究治理程序
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Dec;10(6):637-8. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-637a.
8
The psychosomatic character of clinical governance.临床治理的身心特征。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Mar;31(1):1-2. doi: 10.3109/01674820903553120.
9
The governance structure for data access in the DIRECT consortium: an innovative medicines initiative (IMI) project.DIRECT联盟中数据访问的治理结构:一项创新药物倡议(IMI)项目。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018 Sep 4;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0083-0.
10
Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare.向患有长期疾病的人学习:初级医疗保健治理的新见解
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jul;22(4):405-16. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12097. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits and Risks of Sharing Genomic Data for Research: Comparing the Views of Rare Disease Patients, Informal Carers and Healthcare Professionals.分享基因组数据用于研究的利弊:罕见病患者、非正规照护者和医疗保健专业人员观点的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148788.
2
Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.研究联盟的治理:在欧洲实施负责任的研究与创新所面临的挑战。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Nov 16;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00109-z.
3
Including all voices in international data-sharing governance.

本文引用的文献

1
Data sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainability.联盟数据共享政策设计:可持续性挑战。
Genome Med. 2014 Jan 29;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/gm523. eCollection 2014.
2
Do governance choices matter in health care networks?: an exploratory configuration study of health care networks.治理选择在医疗保健网络中重要吗?:对医疗保健网络的探索性配置研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 24;13:229. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-229.
3
Data sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO).
纳入所有声音参与国际数据共享治理。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Mar 7;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0143-9.
4
The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper.基因组信息可及性扩大带来的挑战:一篇议程设定文件。
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):103-116. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0331-7. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
后基因组时代的数据共享:国际癌症基因组联盟(ICGC)数据访问合规办公室(DACO)的经验。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(7):e1002549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Developing and implementing an institute-wide data sharing policy.制定和实施全院范围的数据共享政策。
Genome Med. 2011 Sep 28;3(9):60. doi: 10.1186/gm276.
5
Reflexive governance in biobanking: on the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law.生物库治理中的反思性治理:论政策主导方法的价值以及认识法律局限性的必要性。
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):347-56. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1066-x. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
6
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions.科学家的数据共享:实践与看法。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
'Access arrangements' for biobanks: a fine line between facilitating and hindering collaboration.生物样本库的“获取安排”:促进与阻碍合作之间的微妙界限。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):104-14. doi: 10.1159/000309852. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
8
Megascience. 'Omics data sharing.大科学。“组学”数据共享。
Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):234-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1180598.
9
Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness.组织中的团队:近期关于绩效与效能的研究
Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:307-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307.
10
Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: an exploration of the Köhler discrepancy effect.了解伴侣作为群体动机提升调节者的能力:对科勒差异效应的探索。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):935-46. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.935.