• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainability.联盟数据共享政策设计:可持续性挑战。
Genome Med. 2014 Jan 29;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/gm523. eCollection 2014.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Regulatory Frameworks for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Scoping Review.监管框架临床试验数据共享:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 4;24(5):e33591. doi: 10.2196/33591.
4
Governance of global health research consortia: Sharing sovereignty and resources within Future Health Systems.全球卫生研究联盟的治理:在未来卫生系统中共享主权与资源。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.039. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Noncommercial US Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.非商业性美国资助者的试验注册、摘要结果获取和个体患者数据可及性政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7498.
6
Policy options to facilitate cancer genomic variant data sharing: outcomes of a modified policy Delphi.促进癌症基因组变异数据共享的政策选项:改进型政策德尔菲法的结果
J Law Biosci. 2023 Jul 14;10(2):lsad022. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsad022. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
7
Investigating the Roles and Responsibilities of Institutional Signing Officials After Data Sharing Policy Reform for Federally Funded Research in the United States: National Survey.美国联邦资助研究数据共享政策改革后机构签署官员的角色与职责调查:全国性调查
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 20;8:e49822. doi: 10.2196/49822.
8
German funders' data sharing policies-A qualitative interview study.德国资助者的数据共享政策——一项定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0296956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296956. eCollection 2024.
9
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships.社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的数据共享。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115895. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa.探索撒哈拉以南非洲地区研究伦理委员会成员对大数据治理的看法。
S Afr J Sci. 2023 May-Jun;119(5-6):52-60. doi: 10.17159/sajs.2023/14905. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Cross-border data sharing through the lens of research ethics committee members in sub-Saharan Africa.通过撒哈拉以南非洲研究伦理委员会成员的视角来看跨境数据共享。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303828. eCollection 2024.
3
Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.公众对基因组数据共享的态度:加拿大某省在线调查结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00967-0.
4
FAIR, ethical, and coordinated data sharing for COVID-19 response: a scoping review and cross-sectional survey of COVID-19 data sharing platforms and registries.公平、合乎道德且协调一致的数据共享以应对 COVID-19:对 COVID-19 数据共享平台和注册中心的范围界定审查和横断面调查。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e712-e736. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00129-2.
5
A one-size-fits-all approach to data-sharing will not suffice in lifecourse research: a grounded theory study of data-sharing from the perspective of participants in a 50-year-old lifecourse study about health and development.一刀切的数据共享方法在生命历程研究中是不够的:一项基于 50 年健康与发展生命历程研究参与者视角的数据共享的扎根理论研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 16;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01940-6.
6
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.非洲综合人口健康数据库的考量:全球最佳实践的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.研究联盟的治理:在欧洲实施负责任的研究与创新所面临的挑战。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Nov 16;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00109-z.
8
The Data Tags Suite (DATS) model for discovering data access and use requirements.数据标签套件 (DATS) 模型,用于发现数据访问和使用需求。
Gigascience. 2020 Feb 1;9(2). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz165.
9
Data Access Committees.数据访问委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Feb 3;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0453-z.
10
A beginner's guide to data stewardship and data sharing.数据管理与数据共享新手指南。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Mar;57(3):169-182. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0232-6. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Reforming biobank consent policy: a necessary move away from broad consent toward dynamic consent.改革生物样本库同意政策:从广泛同意转向动态同意的必要举措。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 Dec;17(12):855-6. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.1550.
2
Ministry of noise.
Nat Genet. 2013 Aug;45(8):843. doi: 10.1038/ng.2724.
3
Geneticists push for global data-sharing.遗传学家推动全球数据共享。
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):16-7. doi: 10.1038/498017a.
4
Data sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO).后基因组时代的数据共享:国际癌症基因组联盟(ICGC)数据访问合规办公室(DACO)的经验。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(7):e1002549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
5
Research priorities. ELSI 2.0 for genomics and society.研究重点。基因组学和社会的 ELSI 2.0。
Science. 2012 May 11;336(6082):673-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1218015.
6
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.从患者到合作伙伴:生物医学研究中的以参与者为中心的举措。
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.
7
On sharing quantitative trait GWAS results in an era of multiple-omics data and the limits of genomic privacy.在多组学数据和基因组隐私限制的时代,共享数量性状 GWAS 结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Apr 6;90(4):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Data sharing: not as simple as it seems.数据共享:并非看上去那么简单。
Environ Health. 2011 Dec 21;10:107. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-107.
9
Developing and implementing an institute-wide data sharing policy.制定和实施全院范围的数据共享政策。
Genome Med. 2011 Sep 28;3(9):60. doi: 10.1186/gm276.
10
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance.从单一生物库到国际网络:发展电子政务。
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

联盟数据共享政策设计:可持续性挑战。

Data sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainability.

机构信息

HeLEX - Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

University of Exeter Law School, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK.

出版信息

Genome Med. 2014 Jan 29;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/gm523. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/gm523
PMID:24475754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3978924/
Abstract

The field of human genomics has led advances in the sharing of data with a view to facilitating translation of research into innovations for human health. This change in scientific practice has been implemented through new policy developed by many principal investigators, project managers and funders, which has ultimately led to new forms of practice and innovative governance models for data sharing. Here, we examine the development of the governance of data sharing in genomics, and explore some of the key challenges associated with the design and implementation of these policies. We examine how the incremental nature of policy design, the perennial problem of consent, the gridlock caused by multiple and overlapping access systems, the administrative burden and the problems with incentives and acknowledgment all have an impact on the potential for data sharing to be maximized. We conclude by proposing ways in which the scientific community can address these problems, to improve the sustainability of data sharing into the future.

摘要

人类基因组学领域的进展推动了数据共享,旨在促进研究转化为人类健康创新。这种科学实践的变化是通过许多首席研究员、项目经理和资助者制定的新政策来实施的,最终导致了数据共享的新实践形式和创新治理模式。在这里,我们研究了基因组学中数据共享治理的发展,并探讨了与这些政策的设计和实施相关的一些关键挑战。我们研究了政策设计的增量性质、同意的长期问题、多个和重叠的访问系统造成的僵局、行政负担以及激励和认可问题如何对数据共享的最大化潜力产生影响。最后,我们提出了科学界可以解决这些问题的方法,以提高数据共享未来的可持续性。