Suppr超能文献

终末期血管通路失败:我们能否定义以及能否分类?

End-stage vascular access failure: can we define and can we classify?

作者信息

Al Shakarchi Julien, Nath Jay, McGrogan Damian, Khawaja Aurangzaib, Field Melanie, Jones Robert G, Inston Nicholas

机构信息

Department of Renal Surgery , QEHB, University Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK ; ReDVA Research Consortium.

Department of Renal Surgery , QEHB, University Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2015 Oct;8(5):590-3. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv055. Epub 2015 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy using dialysis has evolved dramatically over recent years with an improvement in patient survival. With this increased longevity, a cohort of patients are in the precarious position of having exhausted the standard routes of vascular access. The extent of this problem of failed access or 'desperate measures' access is difficult to determine, as there are no uniform definitions or classification allowing standardization and few studies have been performed. The aim of this study is to propose a classification of end-stage vascular access (VA) failure and subsequently test its applicability in a dialysis population.

METHODS

Using anatomical stratification, a simple hierarchical classification is proposed. This has been applied to a large dialysis population and in particular to patients referred to the complex access clinic dedicated to patients identified as having exhausted standard VA options and also those dialysing on permanent central venous catheters (CVC).

RESULTS

A simple classification is proposed based on a progressive anatomical grading of (I) standard upper arm options exhausted, (II) femoral options exhausted and (III) other options exhausted. These are further subdivided anatomically to allow ease of classification. When applied to a complex group of patients (n = 145) referred to a dedicated complex access clinic, 21 patients were Class I, 26 Class II and 2 Class III. Ninety-six patients did not fall into the classification despite being referred as permanent CVC.

CONCLUSIONS

The numbers of patients who have exhausted definitive access options will continue to increase. This simple classification allows the scope of the problem and proposed solutions to be identified. Furthermore, these solutions can be studied and treatments compared in a standardized fashion. The classification may also be applied if patients have the option of transplantation where iliac vessel preservation is desirable and prioritization policies may be instituted.

摘要

背景

近年来,采用透析的肾脏替代疗法取得了显著进展,患者生存率有所提高。随着寿命的延长,一部分患者面临着常规血管通路用尽的危险处境。由于缺乏统一的定义或分类标准,难以确定通路失败或“极端措施”通路问题的严重程度,且相关研究较少。本研究旨在提出终末期血管通路(VA)失败的分类方法,并随后在透析人群中测试其适用性。

方法

采用解剖分层法,提出一种简单的分级分类方法。该方法已应用于大量透析人群,特别是那些被转诊至专门处理复杂通路问题的诊所的患者,这些患者被认定为已用尽常规VA选择,以及那些使用永久性中心静脉导管(CVC)进行透析的患者。

结果

基于(I)上臂常规选择用尽、(II)股部选择用尽和(III)其他选择用尽的渐进性解剖分级,提出了一种简单的分类方法。这些又在解剖学上进一步细分,以便于分类。当应用于转诊至专门处理复杂通路问题诊所的一组复杂患者(n = 145)时,21例为I类,26例为II类,2例为III类。尽管96例患者被转诊时使用永久性CVC,但未纳入该分类。

结论

已用尽确定性通路选择的患者数量将持续增加。这种简单的分类方法能够确定问题的范围以及提出的解决方案。此外,这些解决方案可以通过标准化方式进行研究和比较治疗效果。如果患者有移植选择且希望保留髂血管并制定优先政策时,该分类方法也可适用。

相似文献

6
From ZeRO to HeRO: Saving lives one HeRO at a time.从零到英雄:一次拯救一条生命,以英雄之举守护众生。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;27:90-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

3
Devices in vascular access: is technology overtaking evidence?血管通路装置:技术是否正在超越证据?
J Vasc Access. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):73-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000207. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
7
Dialysis fistula or graft: the role for randomized clinical trials.透析瘘管或移植物:随机临床试验的作用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2348-54. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06050710. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
8
Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access.血管通路临床实践指南。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul;48 Suppl 1:S176-247. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.029.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验