Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen Gentofte Hospital, and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):418-29. doi: 10.1002/art.39434.
To investigate changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed inflammation and structural lesions in the sacroiliac (SI) joints during treatment with adalimumab versus placebo.
In a 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 52 patients with spondyloarthritis were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of either adalimumab 40 mg (n = 25) or placebo (n = 27) every other week for 12 weeks. Patients in the adalimumab group continued to receive and patients in the placebo group were switched to adalimumab 40 mg every other week for an additional 12 weeks. MRI of the SI joints was performed at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48, and the images were assessed independently in a blinded manner using the modified Berlin and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores for inflammation and structural lesions of the SI joints.
At baseline, 56% of the adalimumab group and ∼72% of the placebo group had an MRI-assessed inflammation score of ≥1. Among the patients with inflammation at baseline, the mean percent reductions in MRI scores for inflammation from week 0 to 12 were greater in the adalimumab group compared with the placebo group (Berlin method, -62% versus -5%; SPARCC method, -58% versus -12% [both P < 0.04]). Furthermore, the mean SPARCC erosion score decreased (-0.6) and the SPARCC backfill score increased (+0.8) in the adalimumab group from week 0 to week 12. From week 12 to week 24, larger absolute reductions in the Berlin/SPARCC inflammation scores and the SPARCC erosion score and larger increases in the Berlin/SPARCC fatty lesion scores were seen in the placebo group compared with the adalimumab group. In univariate regression analyses (analysis of covariance) and multivariate stepwise regression analyses, treatment with adalimumab was independently associated with regression of the SPARCC erosion score from week 0 to 12 but not with changes in the other types of MRI lesions.
Significant changes in the Berlin and SPARCC MRI-assessed inflammation scores and in the SPARCC MRI-assessed erosion scores occurred within 12 weeks after initiation of adalimumab. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment was associated with resolution of erosions and the development of backfill.
研究阿达木单抗与安慰剂治疗期间,骶髂(SI)关节磁共振成像(MRI)评估的炎症和结构病变的变化。
在一项为期 48 周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,52 例脊柱关节炎患者被随机分为皮下注射阿达木单抗 40mg(n=25)或安慰剂(n=27),每两周一次,共 12 周。阿达木单抗组的患者继续接受治疗,安慰剂组的患者转为每两周接受阿达木单抗 40mg 治疗,共 12 周。在 0 周、12 周、24 周和 48 周时进行 SI 关节 MRI 检查,并以盲法独立使用改良柏林和脊柱关节炎研究协会加拿大(SPARCC)MRI 评分评估 SI 关节的炎症和结构病变。
基线时,阿达木单抗组有 56%,安慰剂组有近 72%的患者 MRI 评估的炎症评分≥1。在基线时有炎症的患者中,阿达木单抗组从第 0 周到第 12 周 MRI 炎症评分的平均百分比降低大于安慰剂组(柏林方法,-62%比-5%;SPARCC 方法,-58%比-12%[均 P<0.04])。此外,从第 0 周到第 12 周,阿达木单抗组的 SPARCC 侵蚀评分降低(-0.6),SPARCC 填充评分增加(+0.8)。从第 12 周到第 24 周,安慰剂组的柏林/SPARCC 炎症评分、SPARCC 侵蚀评分的绝对值降低幅度更大,柏林/SPARCC 脂肪病变评分的增加幅度更大。在单变量协方差分析(分析性协方差)和多元逐步回归分析中,阿达木单抗治疗与从第 0 周到第 12 周的 SPARCC 侵蚀评分的消退以及其他类型的 MRI 病变的变化无关。
在开始使用阿达木单抗后 12 周内,柏林和 SPARCC MRI 评估的炎症评分以及 SPARCC MRI 评估的侵蚀评分发生了显著变化。肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗与侵蚀的消退和填充的发展有关。