Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病行为干预方案:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Behavioral Programs for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 1;163(11):836-47. doi: 10.7326/M15-1399. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether behavioral approaches for self-management programs benefit individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus is unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of behavioral programs for patients with type 1 diabetes on behavioral, clinical, and health outcomes and to investigate factors that might moderate effect.

DATA SOURCES

6 electronic databases (1993 to June 2015), trial registries and conference proceedings (2011 to 2014), and reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

36 prospective, controlled studies involving participants of any age group that compared behavioral programs with usual care, active controls, or other programs.

DATA EXTRACTION

One reviewer extracted and another verified data. Two reviewers assessed quality and strength of evidence (SOE).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Moderate SOE showed reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 months after the intervention compared with usual care (mean difference, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.45 to -0.13] percentage points) and compared with active controls (-0.44 [CI, -0.69 to -0.19] percentage points). At the end of the intervention and 12-month follow-up or longer, there were no statistically significant differences in HbA1c (low SOE) for comparisons with usual care or active control. Compared with usual care, generic quality of life at program completion did not differ (moderate SOE). Other outcomes had low or insufficient SOE. Adults appeared to benefit more for glycemic control at program completion (-0.28 [CI, -0.57 to 0.01] percentage points) than did youth (-0.12 [CI, -0.43 to 0.19] percentage points). Program intensity appeared not to influence effectiveness; some individual delivery appears beneficial.

LIMITATIONS

All studies had medium or high risk of bias. There was scarce evidence for many outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Behavioral programs for type 1 diabetes offer some benefit for glycemic control, at least at short-term follow-up, but improvement for other outcomes has not been shown. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014010515).

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERD registration number: CRD42014010515).

摘要

背景

行为方法是否有益于 1 型糖尿病患者的自我管理方案尚不清楚。

目的

确定 1 型糖尿病患者的行为方案对行为、临床和健康结果的影响,并研究可能影响效果的因素。

数据来源

6 个电子数据库(1993 年至 2015 年 6 月)、试验登记处和会议录(2011 年至 2014 年)和参考文献列表。

研究选择

36 项前瞻性、对照研究,涉及任何年龄组的参与者,比较行为方案与常规护理、积极对照或其他方案。

数据提取

一位审查员提取数据,另一位审查员验证数据。两位审查员评估质量和证据强度(SOE)。

数据综合

在干预后 6 个月,与常规护理相比(平均差异,-0.29[95%置信区间,-0.45 至-0.13]个百分点)和与积极对照相比(-0.44[CI,-0.69 至-0.19]个百分点),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的中等 SOE 显示降低。在干预结束和 12 个月随访或更长时间,与常规护理或积极对照相比,HbA1c 没有统计学意义的差异(低 SOE)。与常规护理相比,方案完成时的一般生活质量没有差异(中等 SOE)。其他结果的 SOE 较低或不足。与常规护理相比,成年人在方案完成时的血糖控制获益更多(-0.28[CI,-0.57 至 0.01]个百分点),而青少年获益较少(-0.12[CI,-0.43 至 0.19]个百分点)。方案强度似乎不影响效果;一些个体化的交付似乎是有益的。

局限性

所有研究均具有中高度偏倚风险。许多结果的证据稀缺。

结论

1 型糖尿病的行为方案为血糖控制提供了一些益处,至少在短期随访中是这样,但其他结果的改善尚未显示。(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42014010515)。

主要资金来源

医疗保健研究和质量局。(PROSPERD 注册号:CRD42014010515)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验