Moraes-Filho Jonas, Krawczak Felipe S, Costa Francisco B, Soares João Fábio, Labruna Marcelo B
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de Cruz Alta - UNICRUZ, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 28;10(9):e0139386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139386. eCollection 2015.
This study compared the vector competence of four populations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus group ticks for the bacterium Ehrlichia canis, the agent of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME). Ticks (larvae and nymphs) from the four populations-one from São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil (BSP), one from Rio Grande do Sul state, southern Brazil (BRS), one from Argentina (ARG), and one from Uruguay (URU)-were exposed to E. canis infection by feeding on dogs that were experimentally infected with E. canis. Engorged ticks (larvae and nymphs) were allowed to molt to nymphs and adults, respectively, which were tested by molecular analysis (E. canis-specific PCR assay) and used to infest naïve dogs. Through infestation of adult ticks on naïve dogs, after nymphal acquisition feeding on E. canis-infected dogs, only the BSP population was shown to be competent vectors of E. canis, i.e., only the dogs infested with BSP adult ticks developed clinical illness, seroconverted to E. canis, and yielded E. canis DNA by PCR. This result, demonstrated by two independent replications, is congruent with epidemiological data, since BSP ticks were derived from São Paulo state, Brazil, where CME is highly endemic. On the other hand, BRS, ARG, and URU ticks were derived from a geographical region (South America southern cone) where CME has never been properly documented. Molecular analysis of unfed adults at 30 days post molting support these transmission results, since none of the BRS, ARG, and URU ticks were PCR positive, whereas 1% of the BSP nymphs and 31.8% of the BSP adults contained E. canis DNA. We conclude that the absence or scarcity of cases of CME due to E. canis in the South America southern cone is a result of vector incompetence of the R. sanguineus group ticks that prevail on dogs in this part of South America.
本研究比较了血红扇头蜱属蜱虫的四个种群对犬埃立克体(犬单核细胞埃立克体病的病原体)的媒介能力。来自四个种群的蜱虫(幼虫和若虫)——一个来自巴西东南部圣保罗州(BSP),一个来自巴西南部南里奥格兰德州(BRS),一个来自阿根廷(ARG),一个来自乌拉圭(URU)——通过叮咬经实验感染犬埃立克体的犬只来接触犬埃立克体感染。饱血蜱虫(幼虫和若虫)分别让其蜕皮为若虫和成虫,通过分子分析(犬埃立克体特异性PCR检测)进行检测,并用于感染未接触过病原体的犬只。在若虫从感染犬埃立克体的犬只获取血液后,通过成虫蜱虫感染未接触过病原体的犬只,结果显示只有BSP种群是犬埃立克体的有效传播媒介,即只有被BSP成虫蜱虫感染的犬只出现临床疾病、血清转化为犬埃立克体阳性,并通过PCR检测出犬埃立克体DNA。这一结果经两次独立重复验证,与流行病学数据相符,因为BSP蜱虫来自巴西圣保罗州,该地区犬单核细胞埃立克体病高度流行。另一方面,BRS、ARG和URU蜱虫来自一个(南美洲南锥体)从未有过犬单核细胞埃立克体病确切记录的地理区域。蜕皮后30天未进食的成虫的分子分析支持了这些传播结果,因为BRS、ARG和URU蜱虫均未PCR检测呈阳性,而1%的BSP若虫和31.8%的BSP成虫含有犬埃立克体DNA。我们得出结论,南美洲南锥体地区因犬埃立克体导致的犬单核细胞埃立克体病病例缺失或稀少是该地区犬只身上普遍存在的血红扇头蜱属蜱虫媒介能力不足的结果。