Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Dec;13(1):2321992. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2321992. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is an emerging pathogen in the Netherlands. Multiple divergent viral strains are circulating and the focal distribution of TBEV remains poorly understood. This may, however, be explained by differences in the susceptibility of tick populations for specific viruses and viral strains, and by viral strains having higher infection success in their local tick population. We investigated this hypothesis by exposing Dutch ticks to two different TBEV strains: TBEV-NL from the Netherlands and TBEV-Neudoerfl from Austria. In addition, we exposed ticks to louping Ill virus (LIV), which is endemic to large parts of the United Kingdom and Ireland, but has not been reported in the Netherlands. Ticks were collected from two locations in the Netherlands: one location without evidence of TBEV circulation and one location endemic for the TBEV-NL strain. Ticks were infected in a biosafety level 3 laboratory using an artificial membrane feeding system. Ticks collected from the region without evidence of TBEV circulation had lower infection rates for TBEV-NL as compared to TBEV-Neudoerfl. , ticks collected from the TBEV-NL endemic region had higher infection rates for TBEV-NL compared to TBEV-Neudoerfl. In addition, LIV infection rates were much lower in Dutch ticks compared to TBEV, which may explain why LIV is not present in the Netherlands. Our findings show that ticks from two distinct geographical populations differ in their susceptibility to TBEV strains, which could be the result of differences in the genetic background of the tick populations.
蜱传脑炎病毒(TBEV)在荷兰是一种新出现的病原体。有多种不同的病毒株在传播,而 TBEV 的局部分布仍不清楚。然而,这可能是由于蜱种群对特定病毒和病毒株的易感性不同,以及特定病毒株在当地蜱种群中具有更高的感染成功率所致。我们通过将荷兰蜱暴露于两种不同的 TBEV 株(来自荷兰的 TBEV-NL 和来自奥地利的 TBEV-Neudoerfl)来研究这一假设。此外,我们还将蜱暴露于卢平伊病毒(LIV)中,LIV 在地中海地区的大部分地区流行,但在荷兰尚未报告。蜱从荷兰的两个地点采集:一个没有 TBEV 传播证据的地点和一个 TBEV-NL 流行的地点。蜱在生物安全 3 级实验室中使用人工膜喂养系统进行感染。从没有 TBEV 传播证据的地区采集的蜱对 TBEV-NL 的感染率低于 TBEV-Neudoerfl。相比之下,从 TBEV-NL 流行地区采集的蜱对 TBEV-NL 的感染率高于 TBEV-Neudoerfl。此外,与 TBEV 相比,荷兰蜱对 LIV 的感染率要低得多,这可能解释了为什么 LIV 不在荷兰存在。我们的研究结果表明,来自两个不同地理种群的蜱在对 TBEV 株的易感性方面存在差异,这可能是蜱种群遗传背景不同的结果。