Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童和成人药物难治性癫痫

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric and Adult Patients with Pharmaco-resistant Epilepsy.

作者信息

Meng Fan-Gang, Jia Fu-Min, Ren Xiao-Hui, Ge Yan, Wang Kai-Liang, Ma Yan-Shan, Ge Ming, Zhang Kai, Hu Wen-Han, Zhang Xin, Hu Wei, Zhang Jian-Guo

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 5;128(19):2599-604. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.166023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over past two decades, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been widely used and reported to alleviate seizure frequency worldwide, however, so far, only hundreds of patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy (PRE) have been treated with VNS in mainland China. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VNS for Chinese patients with PRE and compare its relationship with age cohort and gender.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcome of 94 patients with PRE, who were treated with VNS at Beijing Fengtai Hospital and Beijing Tiantan Hospital between November 2008 and April 2014 from our database of 106 consecutive patients. The clinical data analysis was retrospectively examined.

RESULTS

Seizure frequency significantly decreased with VNS therapy after intermittent stimulation of the vagus nerve. At last follow-up, we found McHugh classifications of Class I in 33 patients (35.1%), Class II in 27 patients (28.7%), Class III in 20 patients (21.3%), Class IV in 3 patients (3.2%), and Class V in 11 patients (11.7%). Notably, 8 (8.5%) patients were seizure-free while ≥50% seizure frequency reduction occurred in as many as 60 patients (63.8%). Furthermore, with regard to the modified Engel classification, 12 patients (12.8%) were classified as Class I, 11 patients (11.7%) were classified as Class II, 37 patients (39.4%) were classified as Class III, 34 patients (36.2%) were classified as Class IV. We also found that the factors of gender or age are not associated with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative study confirmed that VNS is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for Chinese PRE patients. VNS reduced the seizure frequency regardless of age or gender of studied patients.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中,迷走神经刺激术(VNS)已被广泛应用,且据报道在全球范围内可降低癫痫发作频率。然而,迄今为止,中国大陆仅有数百名药物难治性癫痫(PRE)患者接受了VNS治疗。本研究旨在评估VNS对中国PRE患者的有效性,并比较其与年龄组和性别的关系。

方法

我们回顾性评估了94例PRE患者的临床结局,这些患者于2008年11月至2014年4月在北京丰台医院和北京天坛医院接受VNS治疗,数据来自我们连续106例患者的数据库。对临床数据分析进行回顾性检查。

结果

在间歇性刺激迷走神经后,VNS治疗使癫痫发作频率显著降低。在最后一次随访时,我们发现33例患者(35.1%)为McHugh I级,27例患者(28.7%)为II级,20例患者(21.3%)为III级,3例患者(3.2%)为IV级,11例患者(11.7%)为V级。值得注意的是,8例(8.5%)患者无癫痫发作,多达60例患者(63.8%)癫痫发作频率降低≥50%。此外,根据改良Engel分类,12例患者(12.8%)为I级,11例患者(11.7%)为II级,37例患者(39.4%)为III级,34例患者(36.2%)为IV级。我们还发现性别或年龄因素与临床结局无关。

结论

这项比较研究证实,VNS对中国PRE患者是一种安全、耐受性良好且有效的治疗方法。无论研究患者的年龄或性别如何,VNS均可降低癫痫发作频率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Factors Affecting Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Epilepsy.影响癫痫患者迷走神经刺激术疗效的因素
Neurol Res Int. 2021 Aug 3;2021:9927311. doi: 10.1155/2021/9927311. eCollection 2021.
6
Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗癫痫的研究进展。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Nov;25(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1111/cns.13209. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验