Pasam R T, Esemuede I O, Lee-Kong S A, Kiran R P
Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 7 South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;19(12):733-43. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1356-8. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
While laparoscopic colorectal resection may be underused in technically challenging circumstances, the minimally invasive approach may in fact maximally benefit patients at the greatest risk of complications. Obesity and proctectomy pose particular technical challenges during laparoscopic resection and are also associated with the greatest risks of complications, especially surgical site infections (SSIs). We evaluated the role of laparoscopy in minimizing SSI in such patients.
From the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, outcomes for obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2)] and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) patients undergoing colectomy or proctectomy between 2006 and 2011 by the laparoscopic (laparoscopic colectomy, laparoscopic proctectomy) or open (open colectomy, open proctectomy) approaches were compared. A univariate analysis was used to determine the influence of laparoscopic surgery within each group on SSI, and a multivariate analysis evaluated the influence of laparoscopy on SSI for obese patients undergoing proctectomy.
OC patients were more likely than OP, LC, and LP, respectively, to undergo emergency operation and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3-5. Overall SSI rates after OC, OP, LC, and LP were 15.2, 17.6, 8.6, and 10.1 %, respectively (p < 0.001), and for obese patients, the rates were 18.7, 22.3, 10.7, and 13.3 % (p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, open surgery, obesity, proctectomy, younger age, race, steroid use, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior wound infection, transfusion history, previous operation within 30 days, coronary artery or vascular disease, ASA class 3-5, tobacco use, resident involvement, male gender, albumin <3.5 g/dL, and emergent operation were associated with a higher risk of SSI. Laparoscopy reduced the risk of SSI by at least 35 % across all BMI classes and procedures, an effect that persisted on multivariate analysis even in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.
In colorectal surgery, an already high-risk outlier for SSI, obesity and proctectomy are associated with the highest risk of SSI. Despite the particular technical challenges of laparoscopy in these circumstances, the minimally invasive approach attenuates the risk of SSI in these high-risk patients and thus should be strongly considered during treatment planning.
虽然在技术要求较高的情况下,腹腔镜结直肠切除术的应用可能不足,但微创方法实际上可能使并发症风险最高的患者受益最大。肥胖和直肠切除术在腹腔镜切除术中带来特殊的技术挑战,并且也与最高的并发症风险相关,尤其是手术部位感染(SSI)。我们评估了腹腔镜检查在降低此类患者SSI风险中的作用。
从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中,比较了2006年至2011年间通过腹腔镜(腹腔镜结肠切除术、腹腔镜直肠切除术)或开放(开放结肠切除术、开放直肠切除术)方法接受结肠切除术或直肠切除术的肥胖[体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²]和非肥胖(BMI<30kg/m²)患者的结局。采用单因素分析确定每组中腹腔镜手术对SSI的影响,多因素分析评估腹腔镜检查对接受直肠切除术的肥胖患者SSI的影响。
与开放结肠切除术(OC)、开放直肠切除术(OP)、腹腔镜结肠切除术(LC)和腹腔镜直肠切除术(LP)相比,OC患者更有可能接受急诊手术且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分为3-5。OC、OP、LC和LP后的总体SSI发生率分别为15.2%、17.6%、8.6%和10.1%(p<0.001),肥胖患者的发生率分别为18.7%、22.3%、10.7%和13.3%(p<0.001)。单因素分析显示,开放手术(open surgery)、肥胖、直肠切除术、年轻、种族、使用类固醇、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、既往伤口感染、输血史、30天内既往手术、冠状动脉或血管疾病、ASA 3-5级、吸烟、住院医师参与、男性、白蛋白<3.5g/dL和急诊手术与SSI风险较高相关。腹腔镜检查在所有BMI类别和手术中使SSI风险降低至少35%,即使在接受直肠切除术的肥胖患者中,这一效果在多因素分析中仍然存在。
在结直肠手术中,肥胖和直肠切除术作为SSI的高危因素,与最高的SSI风险相关。尽管在这些情况下腹腔镜检查存在特殊的技术挑战,但微创方法可降低这些高危患者的SSI风险,因此在治疗规划时应予以充分考虑。