Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
NCIC Clinical Trials Group and Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
Lung Cancer. 2015 Nov;90(2):288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Prognostic and predictive ability of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal derived factor (SDF)-1α and soluble VEGF receptors (sVEGFR) 2 and 3, were evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients enrolled in NCIC Clinical Trials Group BR. 24 comparing chemotherapy with or without cediranib.
Biomarker levels were assessed by ELISA in serum from 149/296 enrolled patients at baseline and 146/149 patients after one treatment cycle. Experimental cut-offs for baseline measures determined using a graphic method were:
VEGF-A: < or ≥1 ng/ml, SDF-1α: ≤ or >3.5 ng/ml, sVEGFR2: < or ≥11 ng/ml and sVEGFR3: < or ≥35.5 ng/ml. Changes in markers from baseline to on-treatment were predefined as increased ≥10%, stable within 10% or decreased ≥10%. Cox regression models were used to correlate biomarkers with patient characteristics and outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
No baseline biomarker was prognostic for OS, however, high baseline sVEGFR2 was prognostic for better PFS (p=0.0008) in the chemotherapy alone arm. Low baseline sVEGFR2 or sVEGFR3 were predictive of PFS benefit from cediranib (interaction p=0.06 and p=0.05, respectively). While on treatment, VEGF-A increases were associated with better PFS (p=0.02) and OS (p=0.01) for cediranib treated patients. Decreases in sVEGFR2 (p=0.01) or sVEGFR3 (p=0.02) were also predictive of better OS in cediranib treated patients.
Low baseline sVEGFR2 and sVEGFR3 were predictive for PFS benefit from cediranib, whereas increases in VEGF-A and decreases in sVEGFR2 or sVEGFR3 levels from baseline to on-treatment were predictive of an OS benefit from cediranib in chemotherapy treated NSCLC patients. Validation of these results is warranted.
在 NCIC 临床试验组 BR.24 中,比较化疗加或不加西地尼布治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,评估循环血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、基质衍生因子(SDF)-1α和可溶性 VEGF 受体(sVEGFR)2 和 3 的预后和预测能力。
通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测基线时 149/296 例入组患者和 146/149 例患者在一个治疗周期后的血清中生物标志物水平。使用图形方法确定基线测量的实验截止值为:
VEGF-A:<或≥1ng/ml,SDF-1α:≤或>3.5ng/ml,sVEGFR2:<或≥11ng/ml,sVEGFR3:<或≥35.5ng/ml。从基线到治疗过程中标志物的变化被定义为增加≥10%、稳定在 10%以内或减少≥10%。Cox 回归模型用于将生物标志物与患者特征和结局相关联,包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
没有基线生物标志物与 OS 相关,但在单独化疗组中,高基线 sVEGFR2 与更好的 PFS 相关(p=0.0008)。低基线 sVEGFR2 或 sVEGFR3 预测 cediranib 治疗的 PFS 获益(交互作用 p=0.06 和 p=0.05)。在治疗期间,VEGF-A 增加与 cediranib 治疗患者的 PFS 获益(p=0.02)和 OS 获益(p=0.01)相关。sVEGFR2 减少(p=0.01)或 sVEGFR3 减少(p=0.02)也预测 cediranib 治疗患者的 OS 获益。
低基线 sVEGFR2 和 sVEGFR3 预测 cediranib 治疗的 PFS 获益,而从基线到治疗过程中 VEGF-A 的增加和 sVEGFR2 或 sVEGFR3 水平的减少预测 cediranib 治疗化疗的 NSCLC 患者的 OS 获益。需要进一步验证这些结果。