Pediatric Clinical Research Office, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):e983-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3402.
Treatments and interventions used to care for children in emergencies should be based on strong evidence. Well-designed clinical trials investigating these interventions for children are therefore indispensable. Parental informed consent is a key ethical requirement for the enrollment of children in such studies. However, if time is limited because of an urgent need for intervention, there are additional ethical challenges to adequately support the informed consent process. The acute situation and associated psychological impact may compromise the ability of parents to give informed consent. Little evidence exists to guide the process of consent seeking for a child's research participation when time is limited. It is also unclear in what circumstances alternatives to prospective informed consent could be applied. This article describes possible options to manage the informed consent process in an appropriate, practical, and, we believe, ethical way when time is limited.
用于紧急情况下照顾儿童的治疗和干预措施应该基于强有力的证据。因此,针对这些干预措施对儿童进行的精心设计的临床试验是不可或缺的。父母知情同意是将儿童纳入此类研究的关键伦理要求。然而,如果由于需要紧急干预而时间有限,则在充分支持知情同意过程方面会面临额外的伦理挑战。紧急情况和相关的心理影响可能会影响父母做出知情同意的能力。在时间有限的情况下,几乎没有证据可以指导儿童参与研究的同意寻求过程。在什么情况下可以适用替代前瞻性知情同意的情况也不清楚。本文描述了在时间有限的情况下,以适当、实用且我们认为合乎伦理的方式管理知情同意过程的可能选择。