• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿临床试验:如何优化知情同意和决策?家长代表和临床医生的欧洲德尔菲调查。

Clinical trials in neonates: How to optimise informed consent and decision making? A European Delphi survey of parent representatives and clinicians.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France.

Doctoral School MTCI - Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198097. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0198097
PMID:29897934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5999079/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Parental consent for the participation of their neonate in neonatal research is influenced by the quality of the information delivered and the interaction between parents and investigators. Failure to provide important information may lead to difficulties in the decision making process of parents. This Delphi survey aims to establish a consensus between parent representatives of neonatal associations and healthcare professionals concerning the information deemed essential by both parties in order to improve the recruitment of neonates into clinical trials.

METHOD

This study was conducted in Europe among parent representatives and healthcare professionals. In this 3-phase study, 96 items were defined by the Scientific Committee (CS), composed of 11 clinicians (from 8 countries) and 1 parent representative of the European network of neonatal associations. Then the Committee of Experts (CE) composed of 16 clinicians were matched by country with 16 national parent representatives and evaluated these items in two rounds. The importance of each item was evaluated by each member of the CE on a scale between 1 and 9 based on their personal experience.

RESULTS

Fifty eight items reached the second and final level of consensus. In contrast to clinicians, parent representatives preferred to be informed about the study by the physician in charge of their child. They also favoured additional support during the informed consent process and stated that both parents need to agree and sign.

CONCLUSION

The set of 58 items on which parents and clinicians reached consensus will be helpful to healthcare professionals seeking parental consent for the inclusion of a neonate in a clinical trial. Providing parents with information about the trial by the investigator in the presence of the patient's neonatologist, developing closer contacts with parents and informing them of the available support by parents associations may be helpful for parents.

摘要

目的

新生儿父母对新生儿参与新生儿研究的同意受到所提供信息的质量以及父母与研究人员之间互动的影响。未能提供重要信息可能导致父母决策过程出现困难。这项德尔菲调查旨在确定新生儿协会的父母代表和医疗保健专业人员之间的共识,即双方认为对于提高临床试验中新生儿的入组至关重要的信息。

方法

本研究在欧洲的父母代表和医疗保健专业人员中进行。在这项 3 期研究中,科学委员会(CS)确定了 96 项内容,由 11 名临床医生(来自 8 个国家)和 1 名新生儿协会欧洲网络的家长代表组成。然后,由 16 名临床医生组成的专家委员会(CE)按国家与 16 名国家家长代表相匹配,并在两轮中评估这些项目。CE 的每位成员根据个人经验,在 1 到 9 的范围内对每项内容的重要性进行评估。

结果

有 58 项内容达到了第二轮和最终的共识水平。与临床医生相比,家长代表更希望由负责他们孩子的医生告知他们有关研究的情况。他们还希望在知情同意过程中获得额外的支持,并表示需要父母双方同意并签字。

结论

父母和临床医生达成共识的 58 项内容将有助于医疗保健专业人员在临床试验中寻求父母对新生儿入组的同意。由研究者在新生儿科医生在场的情况下向父母提供有关试验的信息,与父母建立更密切的联系,并告知他们父母协会提供的支持,这可能对父母有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Clinical trials in neonates: How to optimise informed consent and decision making? A European Delphi survey of parent representatives and clinicians.新生儿临床试验:如何优化知情同意和决策?家长代表和临床医生的欧洲德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198097. eCollection 2018.
2
Parental And Clinician Views Of Consent In Neonatal Research.父母及临床医生对新生儿研究中知情同意的看法。
Ir Med J. 2018 Mar 14;111(3):706.
3
Identifying essential information to support patient decision-making regarding participation in cancer clinical trials: A Delphi study.确定支持患者参与癌症临床试验决策的关键信息:一项德尔菲研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Nov;27(6):e12954. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12954.
4
Embedding best transfusion practice and blood management in neonatal intensive care.将最佳输血实践和血液管理融入新生儿重症监护中。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000694.
5
Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study.获取新生儿随机对照试验的知情同意:Euricon研究中对家长和临床医生的访谈
Lancet. 2000 Dec 16;356(9247):2045-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03401-2.
6
Could the decision of trial participation precede the informed consent process? Evidence from Burkina Faso.试验参与的决定能否先于知情同意过程?来自布基纳法索的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e80800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080800. eCollection 2013.
7
How experience makes a difference: practitioners' views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials.经验如何产生差异:从业者对在儿科和新生儿急救护理试验中使用延期同意的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Nov 6;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-45.
8
An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent.在启动一项包含放弃知情同意的紧急研究之前进行社区咨询的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;6(12):1210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00135.x.
9
Shall parent / patient wishes be fulfilled in any case? A series of 32 ethics consultations: from reproductive medicine to neonatology.在任何情况下都应满足父母/患者的意愿吗?一系列 32 次伦理咨询:从生殖医学到新生儿学。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0342-x.
10
Informed consent for a neonatal clinical trial: parental experiences and perspectives.新生儿临床试验的知情同意:父母的经验和观点。
J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;38(7):865-872. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0119-6. Epub 2018 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Placenta and Artificial Womb Technologies for Lung and Kidney Failure: A Holistic Perspective.用于肺和肾衰竭的人工胎盘和人工子宫技术:全面视角
ASAIO J. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002443.
2
Direct-to-participant recruitment of mothers and infants: A strategic approach during challenging pandemic times.直接面向参与者招募母婴:在充满挑战的疫情时期的一种战略方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 17;38:101261. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101261. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process.患者和公众参与临床试验的方法学研究重点:改良 Delphi 法。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1401-1410. doi: 10.1111/hex.12583. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
Informed consent for paediatric clinical trials in Europe.欧洲儿科临床试验的知情同意书。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Nov;101(11):1017-1025. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310001. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Clinical Trial Decisions in Difficult Circumstances: Parental Consent Under Time Pressure.
家长对参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.
4
Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era.新生儿临床研究:数字时代知情同意流程的重新设计
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 1;9:724431. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.724431. eCollection 2021.
5
Parental Enrollment Decision-Making for a Neonatal Clinical Trial.父母为新生儿临床试验做出入组决策。
J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;239:143-149.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list.新生儿试验的知情同意:需考虑的实际要点及清单
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Dec 29;4(1):e000847. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000847. eCollection 2020.
7
Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.与参与新生儿临床试验的决策相关的父母因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032106. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32106.
8
Parental perspectives long term after neonatal clinical trial participation: a survey.新生儿临床试验参与后家长的长期看法:一项调查。
Trials. 2020 Nov 2;21(1):907. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04787-0.
9
Barriers and Challenges in Performing Pharmacokinetic Studies to Inform Dosing in the Neonatal Population.开展药代动力学研究以指导新生儿用药剂量时的障碍与挑战。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Feb 5;8(1):16. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8010016.
10
The ethical justification for inclusion of neonates in pragmatic randomized clinical trials for emergency newborn care.将新生儿纳入紧急新生儿护理实用随机临床试验的伦理理由。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1600-x.
艰难情况下的临床试验决策:时间压力下的父母同意。
Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):e983-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3402.
4
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
5
A Delphi process to optimize quality and performance of drug evaluation in neonates.一种优化新生儿药物评估质量和性能的德尔菲法。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e104976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104976. eCollection 2014.
6
Determining information for inclusion in a decision-support intervention for clinical trial participation: a modified Delphi approach.确定纳入临床试验参与决策支持干预措施的信息:一种改良的德尔菲法。
Clin Trials. 2013;10(6):967-76. doi: 10.1177/1740774513508339. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
7
Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study.父母对儿童实体瘤一线随机临床试验获益/风险的理解:一项两阶段横断面访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002733.
8
Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.影响父母参与临床研究决策的因素:同意者与不同意者。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050.
9
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey.制定临床试验方案内容指南:德尔菲共识调查。
Trials. 2012 Sep 24;13:176. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-176.
10
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.运用和报告德尔菲法选择医疗质量指标:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. Epub 2011 Jun 9.