Van Hook Matthew J, Thoreson Wallace B
Truhlsen Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Truhlsen Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Neuroscience, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Physiol Rep. 2015 Sep;3(9). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12567.
Differences in synaptic transmission between rod and cone photoreceptors contribute to different response kinetics in rod- versus cone-dominated visual pathways. We examined Ca(2+) dynamics in synaptic terminals of tiger salamander photoreceptors under conditions that mimicked endogenous buffering to determine the influence on kinetically and mechanistically distinct components of synaptic transmission. Measurements of IC l(Ca) confirmed that endogenous Ca(2+) buffering is equivalent to 0.05 mmol/L EGTA in rod and cone terminals. Confocal imaging showed that with such buffering, depolarization stimulated large, spatially unconstrained [Ca(2+)] increases that spread throughout photoreceptor terminals. We calculated immediately releasable pool (IRP) size and release efficiency in rods by deconvolving excitatory postsynaptic currents and presynaptic Ca(2+) currents. Peak efficiency of ~0.2 vesicles/channel was similar to that of cones (0.3 vesicles/channel). Efficiency in both cell types was not significantly affected by using weak endogenous Ca(2+) buffering. However, weak Ca(2+) buffering speeded Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent replenishment of vesicles to ribbons in both rods and cones, thereby enhancing sustained release. In rods, weak Ca(2+) buffering also amplified sustained release by enhancing CICR and CICR-stimulated release of vesicles at nonribbon sites. By contrast, elevating [Ca(2+)] at nonribbon sites in cones with weak Ca(2+) buffering and by inhibiting Ca(2+) extrusion did not trigger additional release, consistent with the notion that exocytosis from cones occurs exclusively at ribbons. The presence of weak endogenous Ca(2+) buffering in rods and cones facilitates slow, sustained exocytosis by enhancing Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent replenishment of ribbons in both rods and cones and by stimulating nonribbon release triggered by CICR in rods.
视杆和视锥光感受器之间突触传递的差异导致了视杆主导与视锥主导的视觉通路中不同的反应动力学。我们在模拟内源性缓冲的条件下,研究了虎蝾螈光感受器突触终末的Ca(2+)动态变化,以确定其对突触传递动力学和机制上不同成分的影响。ICl(Ca)测量结果证实,视杆和视锥终末的内源性Ca(2+)缓冲相当于约0.05 mmol/L的EGTA。共聚焦成像显示,在这种缓冲条件下,去极化刺激了大量、空间上不受限制的[Ca(2+)]增加,其扩散至整个光感受器终末。我们通过对兴奋性突触后电流和突触前Ca(2+)电流进行反卷积,计算了视杆中即时可释放池(IRP)的大小和释放效率。约0.2个囊泡/通道的峰值效率与视锥的峰值效率相似(约0.3个囊泡/通道)。使用弱内源性Ca(2+)缓冲对两种细胞类型的效率均无显著影响。然而,弱Ca(2+)缓冲加快了视杆和视锥中囊泡通过Ca(2+)/钙调蛋白(CaM)依赖的方式补充到突触带的过程,从而增强了持续释放。在视杆中,弱Ca(2+)缓冲还通过增强非突触带部位的钙诱导钙释放(CICR)和CICR刺激的囊泡释放,放大了持续释放。相比之下,在视锥中通过弱Ca(2+)缓冲提高非突触带部位的[Ca(2+)]并抑制Ca(2+)外流,并未触发额外的释放,这与视锥中的胞吐作用仅发生在突触带的观点一致。视杆和视锥中弱内源性Ca(2+)缓冲的存在,通过增强视杆和视锥中囊泡通过Ca(2+)/CaM依赖的方式补充到突触带的过程以及刺激视杆中由CICR触发的非突触带释放,促进了缓慢、持续的胞吐作用。