Garrocho-Rangel A, Lozano-Vázquez C, Butrón-Tellez-Girón C, Escobar-García D, Ruíz-Rodriguez S, Pozos-Guillén A
Pediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Program, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México.
Basic Sciences Laboratory, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México.
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;16(3):212-6.
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the rate of sealant retention and microleakage after placement on etched enamel with and without prior deproteinisation.
75 freshly extracted third molars were randomly assigned to either of two pit and fissure treatment methods. Samples from both groups were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel for 15 seconds, followed by placement of a sealant, and then subjected to thermocycling for evaluation of sealant retention. After that, specimens were immersed in rhodamine B, sectioned longitudinally, and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope for assessment of microleakage. Collected data were statistically analysed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests with an α level of 0.05.
The rate of sealant retention was similar between the two study groups (P = 0.073), but the rate of sealant microleakage was significantly lower in the enamel deproteinisation group (P < 0.001) than in the control group.
Based on these findings, we recommend the deproteinisation method prior to enamel acid etching to obtain better clinical results with sealants.
本研究的目的是评估和比较在有或没有预先脱蛋白处理的酸蚀釉质上放置封闭剂后的封闭剂保留率和微渗漏情况。
75颗新鲜拔除的第三磨牙被随机分配到两种窝沟处理方法中的一种。两组样本均用37%磷酸凝胶酸蚀15秒,然后放置封闭剂,接着进行热循环以评估封闭剂保留情况。之后,将标本浸入罗丹明B中,纵向切片,并在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜下检查以评估微渗漏情况。收集的数据使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析,α水平为0.05。
两个研究组之间的封闭剂保留率相似(P = 0.073),但釉质脱蛋白组的封闭剂微渗漏率显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。
基于这些发现,我们建议在釉质酸蚀前采用脱蛋白方法,以使用封闭剂获得更好的临床效果。