Onarheim Kristine Husøy, Taddesse Mieraf, Norheim Ole Frithjof, Abdullah Muna, Miljeteig Ingrid
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Sep 30;14:86. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0218-3.
Reproductive health services are crucial for maternal and child health, but universal health coverage is still not within reach in most societies. Ethiopia's goal of universal health coverage promises access to all necessary services for everyone while providing protection against financial risk. When moving towards universal health coverage, health plans and policies require contextualized knowledge about baseline indicators and their distributions. To understand more about the factors that explain coverage, we study the relationship between socioeconomic and geographic factors and the use of reproductive health services in Ethiopia, and further explore inequalities in reproductive health coverage. Based on these findings, we discuss the normative implications of these findings for health policy. Using population-level data from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (2011) in a multivariate logistic model, we find that family planning and use of antenatal care are associated with higher wealth, higher education and being employed. Skilled attendance at birth is associated with higher wealth, higher education, and urban location. There is large variation between Addis Ababa (the capital) and other administrative regions. Concentration indices show substantial inequalities in the use of reproductive health services. Decomposition of the concentration indices indicates that difference in wealth is the most important explanatory factor for inequality in reproductive health coverage, but other factors, such as urban setting and previous health care use, are also associated with inequalities. When aiming for universal health coverage, this study shows that different socioeconomic factors as well as health-sector factors should be addressed. Our study re-confirms the importance of a broader approach to reproductive health, and in particular the importance of inequality in wealth and geography. Poor, non-educated, non-employed women in rural areas are multidimensionally worse off. The needs of these women should be addressed through elimination of out-of-pocket costs and revision of the formula for resource allocation between regions as Ethiopia moves towards universal health coverage.
生殖健康服务对母婴健康至关重要,但在大多数社会中,全民健康覆盖仍难以实现。埃塞俄比亚的全民健康覆盖目标承诺为每个人提供所有必要服务,同时防范经济风险。在迈向全民健康覆盖的过程中,卫生计划和政策需要有关基线指标及其分布的背景知识。为了更深入了解影响覆盖率的因素,我们研究了埃塞俄比亚社会经济和地理因素与生殖健康服务利用之间的关系,并进一步探讨生殖健康覆盖方面的不平等现象。基于这些发现,我们讨论这些发现对卫生政策的规范意义。在多变量逻辑模型中使用来自埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查(2011年)的人口层面数据,我们发现计划生育和产前护理的使用与更高的财富、更高的教育水平和就业相关。熟练的分娩护理与更高的财富、更高的教育水平以及城市地区相关。亚的斯亚贝巴(首都)与其他行政区之间存在很大差异。集中度指数显示出生殖健康服务利用方面存在严重不平等。集中度指数的分解表明,财富差异是生殖健康覆盖不平等的最重要解释因素,但其他因素,如城市环境和以前的医疗保健使用情况,也与不平等现象相关。在追求全民健康覆盖时,本研究表明应解决不同的社会经济因素以及卫生部门因素。我们的研究再次证实了采取更广泛方法应对生殖健康问题的重要性,特别是财富和地理方面不平等的重要性。农村地区贫困、未受过教育、未就业的妇女在多方面处境更差。随着埃塞俄比亚迈向全民健康覆盖,应通过消除自付费用和修订地区间资源分配公式来满足这些妇女的需求。