• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开创养老院质量改进学习协作:方法与经验教训的案例研究。

Pioneering a Nursing Home Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative: A Case Study of Method and Lessons Learned.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.

School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Feb;17(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.014
PMID:26420494
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development of a nursing home (NH) quality improvement learning collaborative (QILC) that provides Lean Six Sigma (LSS) training and infrastructure support for quality assurance performance improvement change efforts.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven NHs located in the Greater Rochester, NY area.

INTERVENTION

The learning collaborative approach in which interprofessional teams from different NHs work together to improve common clinical and organizational processes by sharing experiences and evidence-based practices to achieve measurable changes in resident outcomes and system efficiencies.

MEASUREMENTS

NH participation, curriculum design, LSS projects.

RESULTS

Over 6 years, 27 NHs from urban and rural settings joined the QILC as organizational members and sponsored 47 interprofessional teams to learn LSS techniques and tools, and to implement quality improvement projects.

CONCLUSIONS

NHs, in both urban and rural settings, can benefit from participation in QILCs and are able to learn and apply LSS tools in their team-based quality improvement efforts.

摘要

目的

描述一个养老院(NH)质量改进学习协作(QILC)的发展,该协作提供精益六西格玛(LSS)培训和基础设施支持,以推动质量保证绩效改进的变革。

设计

案例报告。

地点/参与者:位于纽约州罗彻斯特大都市区的 27 家 NH。

干预措施

学习协作方法,来自不同 NH 的跨专业团队共同合作,通过分享经验和基于证据的实践,改善共同的临床和组织流程,以实现居民结果和系统效率的可衡量变化。

测量

NH 参与度、课程设计、LSS 项目。

结果

在 6 年多的时间里,来自城市和农村地区的 27 家 NH 作为组织成员加入了 QILC,并赞助了 47 个跨专业团队,以学习 LSS 技术和工具,并实施质量改进项目。

结论

城市和农村地区的 NH 都可以从 QILC 的参与中受益,并能够在他们的团队质量改进工作中学习和应用 LSS 工具。

相似文献

1
Pioneering a Nursing Home Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative: A Case Study of Method and Lessons Learned.开创养老院质量改进学习协作:方法与经验教训的案例研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Feb;17(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
2
Reducing potentially preventable hospital transfers: results from a thirty nursing home collaborative.减少潜在可预防的医院转院:三十家养老院合作的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):651-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Communication and effectiveness in a US nursing home quality-improvement collaborative.美国一家养老院质量改进协作中的沟通与成效
Nurs Health Sci. 2014 Sep;16(3):291-7. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12098. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
4
Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands.采用质量改进协作方法提高养老院护理质量:从英国和荷兰开展的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207601.
5
Quality improvement for pressure ulcer care in the nursing home setting: the Northeast Pressure Ulcer Project.养老院环境中压疮护理的质量改进:东北压疮项目
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;4(6):291-301. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000094064.06058.74.
6
Implementation of a nursing home quality improvement project to reduce resident pain: a qualitative case study.实施一项旨在减轻疗养院居民疼痛的质量改进项目:一项定性案例研究。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2015 Jul-Sep;30(3):261-8. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000099.
7
The influence of teams to sustain quality improvement in nursing homes that "need improvement".养老院“需要改进”的团队对持续质量改进的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jan;14(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
Applying a Theory-Driven Framework to Guide Quality Improvement Efforts in Nursing Homes: The LOCK Model.运用理论驱动框架指导养老院质量改进工作:LOCK 模型。
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):598-605. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx023.
9
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.佛蒙特牛津网络:新生儿学基于证据的质量改进。
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9.
10
Reducing perceived barriers to nursing homes data entry in the advancing excellence campaign: the role of LANEs (Local Area Networks for Excellence).降低在卓越推进运动中对养老院数据录入的感知障碍:LANEs(卓越的局域网)的作用。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Sep;12(7):508-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to enhance safety culture for nursing professionals in long-term care: A systematic review.长期护理中提升护理专业人员安全文化的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Feb 9;5:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100119. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
3
Organizational and Resident Characteristics of Nursing Homes Associated With Partial and Complete Implementation of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory.
与《日常生活偏好量表》部分及完全实施相关的养老院组织与住客特征
Innov Aging. 2023 Feb 3;7(2):igad008. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad008. eCollection 2023.
4
Aiming for quality: a global compass for national learning systems.追求质量:国家学习体系的全球指南。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 19;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00746-6.
5
Partnership to Enhance Resident Outcomes for Community Living Center Residents With Dementia: Description of the Protocol and Preliminary Findings.改善社区生活中心痴呆症患者住院结局的合作项目:方案描述与初步结果
J Gerontol Nurs. 2019 Mar 1;45(3):21-30. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20190211-03.
6
Applying a Theory-Driven Framework to Guide Quality Improvement Efforts in Nursing Homes: The LOCK Model.运用理论驱动框架指导养老院质量改进工作:LOCK 模型。
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):598-605. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx023.