• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands.采用质量改进协作方法提高养老院护理质量:从英国和荷兰开展的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207601.
2
Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol.旨在实现养老院老年人主动医疗保健的质量改进协作项目(PEACH):一项现实主义评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):e023287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023287.
3
How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation.如何通过质量改进合作来改善养老院的医疗保健:一个实际评估。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1371-1381. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab007.
4
In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data-possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time.基于注册数据对来自不同医疗保健领域的两个质量改进合作组织进行深入比较——可能有助于在项目时间之外持续改善结果的因素。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jul 23;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0926-y.
5
The effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in improving stroke care and the facilitators and barriers to their implementation: a systematic review.质量改进合作在改善卒中护理方面的效果及其实施的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 3;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01162-8.
6
Pioneering a Nursing Home Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative: A Case Study of Method and Lessons Learned.开创养老院质量改进学习协作:方法与经验教训的案例研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Feb;17(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Virtual quality improvement collaborative with primary care practices during COVID-19: a case study within a clinically integrated network.在 COVID-19 大流行期间与基层医疗机构开展虚拟质量改进合作:临床整合网络内的案例研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Feb 13;13(1):e002400. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002400.
8
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
9
Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.理解质量改进协作的组成部分:系统文献回顾。
Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):354-94. doi: 10.1111/milq.12016.
10
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the organisation and delivery of falls management in care homes for older people in England.探索英格兰养老院中老年人跌倒管理的组织与实施情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06127-w.
2
Improving and supporting quality of care in Dutch nursing homes: a quantitative study.提高和支持荷兰养老院的护理质量:一项定量研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12640-w.
3
Improving relationship-centered care through evaluation meetings with the resident-family-caregiver triad in nursing homes: a qualitative study.通过与养老院中的住院患者-家属-护理人员三方进行评估会议来改善以关系为中心的护理:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12425-1.
4
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
5
"Crack on": a qualitative study of care home managers experiences and responses to system-led setbacks during the crisis of the COVID-19 Pandemic in England.“继续努力”:一项定性研究,探讨英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行危机期间,养老院管理者在系统主导的挫折面前的经历和应对。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):811-821. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00804-y. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
6
Improving the quality of care in nursing home organizations with urgent quality issues: design and effectiveness of a Dutch government-funded support programme.提高有紧急质量问题的养老院组织的护理质量:荷兰政府资助的支持计划的设计和效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 18;23(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09538-w.
7
Frailty nurse and GP-led models of care in care homes: the role of contextual factors impacting Enhanced health in care homes framework implementation.养老护理机构中衰弱护士和全科医生主导的护理模式:增强健康在养老护理机构框架实施中所面临的影响因素的作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 3;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03742-3.
8
Turning evidence into action using a senior friendly hospital framework and a collaborative network.利用老年友善医院框架和协作网络将证据转化为行动。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2022 Nov;35(6):363-369. doi: 10.1177/08404704221121800. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
9
Identifying the key characteristics of falls management programmes in UK care homes - A scoping review of grey literature.确定英国养老院跌倒管理计划的关键特征——灰色文献的范围综述
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2022 Sep 1;7(3):165-174. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-07-165. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review.全科医生在改善养老院医疗保健中的作用:一个实际主义综述。
Fam Pract. 2023 Feb 9;40(1):119-127. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac071.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes.长期护理环境中的质量改进:养老院中使用的有效策略的范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb;12(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
2
Covid-19 and lack of linked datasets for care homes.新冠疫情与护理院缺乏关联数据集的情况。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 24;369:m2463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2463.
3
Reducing hospital admissions in older care home residents: a 4-year evaluation of the care home innovation Programme (CHIP).降低老年养老院居民的住院率:养老院创新计划(CHIP)的 4 年评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4945-9.
4
We're all different and we're the same: the story of the European nursing home resident.我们各不相同却又殊途同归:欧洲养老院居民的故事。
Age Ageing. 2019 Dec 1;49(1):3-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz145.
5
Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol.旨在实现养老院老年人主动医疗保健的质量改进协作项目(PEACH):一项现实主义评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):e023287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023287.
6
An evaluation of a safety improvement intervention in care homes in England: a participatory qualitative study.英格兰养老院安全改进干预措施评估:一项参与式定性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Nov;111(11):414-421. doi: 10.1177/0141076818803457. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Accurate identification of hospital admissions from care homes; development and validation of an automated algorithm.准确识别养老院住院患者;自动化算法的开发和验证。
Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):387-391. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx182.
8
A Structured Process Description of a Pragmatic Implementation Project: Improving Integrated Care for Older Persons in Residential Care Homes.一个务实实施项目的结构化流程描述:改善养老院中老年人的综合护理
Inquiry. 2017 Jan-Dec;54:46958017737906. doi: 10.1177/0046958017737906.
9
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
10
Developing Caring Conversations in care homes: an appreciative inquiry.在养老院开展关爱对话:一项积极探究
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jul;25(4):1375-1386. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12436. Epub 2017 Feb 19.

采用质量改进协作方法提高养老院护理质量:从英国和荷兰开展的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。

Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands.

作者信息

Devi Reena, Martin Graham, Banerjee Jay, Butler Louise, Pattison Tim, Cruickshank Lesley, Maries-Tillott Caroline, Wilson Tracie, Damery Sarah, Meyer Julienne, Poot Antonius, Chamberlain Peter, Harvey Debbie, Giebel Clarissa, Hinsliff-Smith Kathryn, Chadborn Neil, Lee Gordon Adam

机构信息

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207601.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207601
PMID:33086576
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7589164/
Abstract

The Breakthrough Series Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) initiative is a well-developed and widely used approach, but most of what we know about it has come from healthcare settings. In this article, those leading QICs to improve care in care homes provide detailed accounts of six QICs and share their learning of applying the QIC approach in the care home sector. Overall, five care home-specific lessons were learnt: (i) plan for the resources needed to support collaborative teams with collecting, processing, and interpreting data; (ii) create encouraging and safe working environments to help collaborative team members feel valued; (iii) recruit collaborative teams, QIC leads, and facilitators who have established relationships with care homes; (iv) regularly check project ideas are aligned with team members' job roles, responsibilities, and priorities; and (v) work flexibly and accept that planned activities may need adapting as the project progresses. These insights are targeted at teams delivering QICs in care homes. These insights demonstrate the need to consider the care home context when applying improvement tools and techniques in this setting.

摘要

“突破系列质量改进协作(QIC)计划”是一种成熟且广泛应用的方法,但我们对它的了解大多来自医疗保健机构。在本文中,那些引领QIC在养老院改善护理的人员详细介绍了六个QIC,并分享了他们在养老院部门应用QIC方法的经验教训。总体而言,学到了五个针对养老院的经验教训:(i)规划支持协作团队收集、处理和解释数据所需的资源;(ii)营造鼓励性和安全性的工作环境,帮助协作团队成员感到自身受到重视;(iii)招募与养老院建立了关系的协作团队、QIC负责人和协调员;(iv)定期检查项目想法是否与团队成员的工作职责、责任和优先事项相一致;(v)灵活工作并接受随着项目进展,计划的活动可能需要调整。这些见解针对的是在养老院实施QIC的团队。这些见解表明,在这种环境中应用改进工具和技术时,需要考虑养老院的背景情况。