Suppr超能文献

采用质量改进协作方法提高养老院护理质量:从英国和荷兰开展的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。

Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands.

作者信息

Devi Reena, Martin Graham, Banerjee Jay, Butler Louise, Pattison Tim, Cruickshank Lesley, Maries-Tillott Caroline, Wilson Tracie, Damery Sarah, Meyer Julienne, Poot Antonius, Chamberlain Peter, Harvey Debbie, Giebel Clarissa, Hinsliff-Smith Kathryn, Chadborn Neil, Lee Gordon Adam

机构信息

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207601.

Abstract

The Breakthrough Series Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) initiative is a well-developed and widely used approach, but most of what we know about it has come from healthcare settings. In this article, those leading QICs to improve care in care homes provide detailed accounts of six QICs and share their learning of applying the QIC approach in the care home sector. Overall, five care home-specific lessons were learnt: (i) plan for the resources needed to support collaborative teams with collecting, processing, and interpreting data; (ii) create encouraging and safe working environments to help collaborative team members feel valued; (iii) recruit collaborative teams, QIC leads, and facilitators who have established relationships with care homes; (iv) regularly check project ideas are aligned with team members' job roles, responsibilities, and priorities; and (v) work flexibly and accept that planned activities may need adapting as the project progresses. These insights are targeted at teams delivering QICs in care homes. These insights demonstrate the need to consider the care home context when applying improvement tools and techniques in this setting.

摘要

“突破系列质量改进协作(QIC)计划”是一种成熟且广泛应用的方法,但我们对它的了解大多来自医疗保健机构。在本文中,那些引领QIC在养老院改善护理的人员详细介绍了六个QIC,并分享了他们在养老院部门应用QIC方法的经验教训。总体而言,学到了五个针对养老院的经验教训:(i)规划支持协作团队收集、处理和解释数据所需的资源;(ii)营造鼓励性和安全性的工作环境,帮助协作团队成员感到自身受到重视;(iii)招募与养老院建立了关系的协作团队、QIC负责人和协调员;(iv)定期检查项目想法是否与团队成员的工作职责、责任和优先事项相一致;(v)灵活工作并接受随着项目进展,计划的活动可能需要调整。这些见解针对的是在养老院实施QIC的团队。这些见解表明,在这种环境中应用改进工具和技术时,需要考虑养老院的背景情况。

相似文献

8
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
10
Developing Caring Conversations in care homes: an appreciative inquiry.在养老院开展关爱对话:一项积极探究
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jul;25(4):1375-1386. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12436. Epub 2017 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验