Valsami Serena, Dimitroulis Dimitrios, Gialeraki Argyri, Chimonidou Maria, Politou Marianna
Department of Blood Transfusion, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Jul-Dec;9(2):117-23. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.162684.
Platelet transfusions have contributed to the revolutionary modern treatment of hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. Despite the long-term application of platelet transfusion in therapeutics, all aspects of their optimal use (i.e., in cases of ABO and/or Rh (D incompatibility) have not been definitively determined yet. We reviewed the available data on transfusion practices and outcome in ABO and RhD incompatibility and platelet refractoriness due to anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. Transfusion of platelets with major ABO-incompatibility is related to reduced posttransfusion platelet (PLT) count increments, compared to ABO-identical and minor, but still are equally effective in preventing clinical bleeding. ABO-minor incompatible transfusions pose the risk of an acute hemolytic reaction of the recipient that is not always related to high anti-A, B donor titers. ABO-identical PLT transfusion seems to be the most effective and safest therapeutic strategy. Exclusive ABO-identical platelet transfusion policy could be feasible, but alternative approaches could facilitate platelet inventory management. Transfusion of platelets from RhD positive donors to RhD negative patients is considered to be effective and safe though is associated with low rate of anti-D alloimmunization due to contaminating red blood cells. The prevention of D alloimmunization is recommended only for women of childbearing age. HLA alloimmunization is a major cause of platelet refractoriness. Managing patients with refractoriness with cross-matched or HLA-matched platelets is the current practice although data are still lacking for the efficacy of this practice in terms of clinical outcome. Leukoreduction contributes to the reduction of both HLA and anti-D alloimmunization.
血小板输注推动了增生低下性血小板减少症的现代革命性治疗。尽管血小板输注在治疗中已长期应用,但其最佳使用的各个方面(即ABO和/或Rh(D)不相容的情况)尚未完全确定。我们回顾了关于ABO和RhD不相容以及因抗人白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体导致的血小板输注无效的输血实践和结果的现有数据。与ABO血型相同和轻微不相容相比,主要ABO不相容的血小板输注与输血后血小板(PLT)计数增加减少有关,但在预防临床出血方面同样有效。ABO轻微不相容输血存在受血者发生急性溶血反应的风险,这种反应并不总是与高抗A、B供体滴度相关。ABO血型相同的血小板输注似乎是最有效和最安全的治疗策略。独家采用ABO血型相同的血小板输注政策可能可行,但其他方法可能有助于血小板库存管理。将RhD阳性供体的血小板输注给RhD阴性患者被认为是有效和安全的,尽管由于污染的红细胞导致抗D同种免疫的发生率较低。仅建议对育龄妇女进行D同种免疫的预防。HLA同种免疫是血小板输注无效的主要原因。目前的做法是用交叉配型或HLA配型的血小板治疗血小板输注无效的患者,尽管在临床结果方面这种做法的疗效数据仍然缺乏。白细胞去除有助于减少HLA和抗D同种免疫。