Heal J M, Blumberg N, Masel D
Blood. 1987 Jul;70(1):23-30.
Refractoriness occurs in many patients receiving multiple platelet transfusions. We used a sensitive ELISA assay to assess the utility of crossmatching HLA-A,B matched single donor platelets in 51 consecutive, typical refractory patients. Of the 222 transfusions evaluated at 1 to 4 hours posttransfusion, only 17 of 54 (31%) with positive crossmatches had corrected platelet count increments of greater than or equal to 7,500/microL. In contrast, 95 of 168 (57%) of those with negative crossmatches had such increments (P less than .001). Regardless of the results of the crossmatch, HLA-A,B, and ABO matching had independent influences on transfusion outcome. The median corrected 1- to 4-hour increment for crossmatch negative transfusions was 13,300/microL for A/BU grade matches, 9,700 for BX, and 7,800 for C. Increments were 10,000/microL for ABO-identical transfusions and 5,900 for transfusions of platelets ABO incompatible with the recipient's plasma antibodies. When the donor platelets were ABO compatible, but the donor plasma contained ABO antibodies to the recipient's platelets, the increment was intermediate (8,200/microL). The most important factor in predicting platelet survival was the crossmatch, followed by HLA-A,B and ABO, each having independent predictive value. These data demonstrate that the predictive value of a negative crossmatch may be considerably less than that reported in previous studies with stable, less ill patients. In typical refractory patients, there appear to be mechanisms of platelet destruction that are related to HLA-A,B and ABO but are not detected with current crossmatch methods. We hypothesize that soluble plasma HLA-A,B and ABO antigens contribute to the destruction of donor and sometimes recipient platelets by an immune complex or other "innocent bystander" mechanism. With our crossmatching technique, HLA-A,B and ABO match grades remain relevant to platelet transfusion therapy in some refractory patients.
许多接受多次血小板输注的患者会出现血小板输注无效的情况。我们使用一种灵敏的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),对51例连续的典型血小板输注无效患者进行了人类白细胞抗原A、B(HLA-A、B)配型的单供者血小板交叉配型的效用评估。在输血后1至4小时评估的222次输血中,交叉配型阳性的54例患者中只有17例(31%)校正血小板计数增加值大于或等于7500/微升。相比之下,交叉配型阴性的168例患者中有95例(57%)有这样的增加值(P<0.001)。无论交叉配型结果如何,HLA-A、B和ABO血型匹配对输血结果均有独立影响。交叉配型阴性输血的1至4小时校正增加值中位数,A/BU血型匹配者为13300/微升,BX为9700/微升,C为7800/微升。ABO血型相同的输血增加值为10000/微升,与受者血浆抗体ABO血型不相容的血小板输血增加值为5900/微升。当供者血小板ABO血型相容,但供者血浆中含有针对受者血小板的ABO抗体时,增加值处于中间水平(8200/微升)。预测血小板存活的最重要因素是交叉配型,其次是HLA-A、B和ABO血型,它们各自都有独立的预测价值。这些数据表明,阴性交叉配型的预测价值可能远低于先前针对病情较轻、病情稳定患者的研究所报告的价值。在典型的血小板输注无效患者中,似乎存在与HLA-A、B和ABO血型相关的血小板破坏机制,但目前的交叉配型方法无法检测到。我们推测,可溶性血浆HLA-A、B和ABO抗原通过免疫复合物或其他“无辜旁观者”机制导致供者血小板,有时也包括受者血小板的破坏。采用我们的交叉配型技术,HLA-A、B和ABO血型匹配等级在一些血小板输注无效患者的血小板输血治疗中仍然具有相关性。