Sintnicolaas K, Löwenberg B
Red Cross Blood Bank Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Br J Haematol. 1996 Mar;92(4):1005-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.414953.x.
Platelet crossmatching may provide a useful way of selecting donors for effective platelet transfusions in patients refractory to random donor platelet concentrates due to alloimmunization. We assessed the predictive value of a flow cytometric platelet immunofluorescence crossmatch test for the outcome of HLA matched platelet transfusions in a group of alloimmunized patients. Platelet immunofluorescence (PIFT) crossmatches were performed for 104 HLA-matched platelet transfusions administered to 30 patients. A negative PIFT crossmatch correctly predicted a successful platelet transfusion (1 h post-transfusion platelet recovery >20%) in 56/75 (75%) cases. We also considered non-immunological factors that, in combination with alloimmunization, might have contributed to an unsuccessful transfusion result, i.e. fever, septicaemia, splenomegaly, disseminated intravascular coagulation and bleeding. The predictive value of a negative PIFT crossmatch was better when these non-immunological factors were absent [48/59 (81%) correct predictions] than when these factors were present [8/16 (50%) correct predictions] (P=0.01; chi-square test). The effect of ABO incompatibility between donor and recipient on the predictive value of the PIFT crossmatch was also analysed. Positive PIFT crossmatches occurred more frequently in ABO incompatible donor-recipient combinations [in 18/28 (64%) cases] than in ABO-compatible donor-recipient combinations [in 11/76 cases (14%)] (P<0.001, chi-square test). Successful platelet transfusions were observed on 53/76 (70%) occasions in ABO compatible transfusions as compared to 16/28 (57%) in ABO incompatible transfusions. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.23; chi-square test). Consequently, a negative PIFT crossmatch appeared to be non-predictive for the transfusion outcome in cases of ABO incompatibility between donor and recipient. We conclude that the PIFT crossmatch for platelet donor selection in addition to matching for HLA antigens, is predictive for the outcome of ABO compatible transfusions in alloimmunized recipients and prediction levels are increased when non-immunological causes for platelet refractoriness are absent.
血小板交叉配型可为因同种免疫而对随机供者血小板浓缩物治疗无效的患者选择有效的血小板供者提供一种有用的方法。我们评估了流式细胞术血小板免疫荧光交叉配型试验对一组同种免疫患者中 HLA 匹配血小板输注结果的预测价值。对 30 例患者进行的 104 次 HLA 匹配血小板输注进行了血小板免疫荧光(PIFT)交叉配型。阴性 PIFT 交叉配型在 56/75(75%)的病例中正确预测了成功的血小板输注(输血后 1 小时血小板回收率>20%)。我们还考虑了与同种免疫共同导致输血结果不成功的非免疫因素,即发热、败血症、脾肿大、弥散性血管内凝血和出血。当不存在这些非免疫因素时,阴性 PIFT 交叉配型的预测价值更好[48/59(81%)正确预测],而当存在这些因素时则较差[8/16(50%)正确预测](P = 0.01;卡方检验)。还分析了供者与受者之间 ABO 血型不相容对 PIFT 交叉配型预测价值的影响。阳性 PIFT 交叉配型在 ABO 血型不相容的供者 - 受者组合中[18/28(64%)的病例]比在 ABO 血型相容的供者 - 受者组合中[11/76 例(14%)]更频繁出现(P<0.001,卡方检验)。ABO 血型相容的输血中,53/76(70%)的情况观察到成功的血小板输注,而 ABO 血型不相容的输血中这一比例为 16/28(57%)。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.23;卡方检验)。因此,在供者与受者 ABO 血型不相容的情况下,阴性 PIFT 交叉配型似乎对输血结果无预测性。我们得出结论,除了 HLA 抗原匹配外,用于血小板供者选择的 PIFT 交叉配型对同种免疫受者中 ABO 血型相容输血的结果具有预测性,并且当不存在血小板输注无效的非免疫原因时预测水平会提高。