Chen Shuo-Wei, Hui Chung-Kun, Chang Jia-Jang, Lee Tsung-Shih, Chan Siu-Cheung, Chien Cheng-Hung, Hu Ching-Chih, Lin Chih-Lang, Chen Li-Wei, Liu Ching-Jung, Yen Cho-Li, Hsieh Po-Jen, Liu Cheng-Kun, Su Chih-Sheng, Yu Chia-Ying, Chien Rong-Nan
Therapeutic Endoscopy Center, Chang Gang Memorial Hospital and University College of Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan.
Department of anesthesiology, Chang Gang Memorial Hospital and University College of Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):808-13. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13181.
CO2 has been reported to be absorbed from the bowel more rapidly than air, resulting in a discomfort reduction after colonoscopy. Its role in deeply sedated patients is limited. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy in patients deeply sedated with propofol.
A total of 125 continuous patients were randomly assigned to receive either CO2 (n = 63) or air (n = 62) insufflation during propofol-sedated colonoscopy. Postcolonoscopy abdominal pain, distention, and satisfaction were assessed at 1, 3, and 24 h after the procedure, and the proportions of pain-free and distention-free patients were compared. Residual bowel gas in the colon and small bowel was evaluated at 1 h after colonoscopy. End-tidal CO2 and O2 saturation was measured for safety analysis.
There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the postcolonoscopy abdominal pain, distention, and subjective satisfaction at 1 h (P < 0.001) and 3 h (P < 0.01) after the procedure. Patients' pain and distention at 1 and 3 h after the procedure were significantly lower in the CO2 group (P < 0.01). Residual bowel gas in the colon and small bowel was significantly less in the CO2 group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in end-tidal CO2 levels between two groups before, during, and after the procedure.
Compared with air, CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy reduced postcolonoscopy abdominal discomfort and improved patients' satisfaction. It was safe to use CO2 insufflation in deeply sedated colonoscopy.
据报道,二氧化碳从肠道吸收的速度比空气快,可减轻结肠镜检查后的不适感。其在深度镇静患者中的作用有限。本研究旨在探讨在丙泊酚深度镇静的患者中进行结肠镜检查时二氧化碳充气的有效性和安全性。
总共125例连续患者在丙泊酚镇静的结肠镜检查期间被随机分配接受二氧化碳(n = 63)或空气(n = 62)充气。在检查后1、3和24小时评估结肠镜检查后腹痛、腹胀及满意度,并比较无痛和无腹胀患者的比例。在结肠镜检查后1小时评估结肠和小肠内的残留肠气。测量呼气末二氧化碳和氧饱和度以进行安全性分析。
两组在检查后1小时(P < 0.001)和3小时(P < 0.01)的结肠镜检查后腹痛、腹胀及主观满意度方面存在显著差异。二氧化碳组患者在检查后1小时和3小时的疼痛和腹胀明显较轻(P < 0.01)。二氧化碳组结肠和小肠内的残留肠气明显较少(P < 0.001)。两组在检查前、检查期间和检查后的呼气末二氧化碳水平无显著差异。
与空气相比,结肠镜检查期间二氧化碳充气可减轻结肠镜检查后的腹部不适并提高患者满意度。在深度镇静的结肠镜检查中使用二氧化碳充气是安全的。