Dharmaraj Rajmohan, Dunn Rachel, Fritz Julia, Dasgupta Mahua, Simpson Pippa, Cabrera Jose, Miranda Adrian, Lerner Diana G
Division of Gastroenterology, University of New Mexico, Carrie Tingley Hospital, Albuquerque, NM.
Division of Department of Gastroenterology, Peyton Manning Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Jul;71(1):34-39. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002650.
Studies have shown the advantages of carbon dioxide (CO2) over air insufflation in the adult population during colonoscopies. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation in deeply sedated children undergoing colonoscopy.
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. We recruited 100 consecutive pediatric patients who had colonoscopy under deep sedation for various indications. Patients were first randomized by history of abdominal pain and then randomly assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. Postprocedural abdominal pain scores were registered on a 10-point visual analog rating scale and significant pain was defined as a score of 3 or higher. Abdominal circumferences and end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels were measured. Complications during and after the procedure were recorded.
We did not find statistically significant difference between CO2 and air insufflation on univariate analysis because of low number of children experiencing significant pain after colonoscopy. After adjusting for baseline pain, we found that pain was significantly lower in patients after CO2 versus air insufflation on multivariable analysis (P = 0.03). The significant factors related to pain were duration of the procedure (P = 0.006), history of abdominal pain (P = 0.002) and previous abdominal surgery (P = 0.02). CO2 insufflation was associated with decreased abdominal circumference after colonoscopy (P = 0.002). Girls were more likely to have pain regardless of intervention (P = .04).
Most children tolerate endoscopic procedures without significant pain. Our study was underpowered to show significant difference between air and CO2 on univariate analysis. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy, however, may reduce postprocedural abdominal pain. Significant factors for increased pain on multivariate analysis included colonoscopy length over 30 minutes, history of abdominal pain, and previous abdominal surgery.
研究表明,在成人结肠镜检查中,二氧化碳(CO₂)充气优于空气充气。本研究旨在调查在深度镇静下接受结肠镜检查的儿童中,CO₂充气的有效性和安全性。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。我们连续招募了100名因各种适应症在深度镇静下接受结肠镜检查的儿科患者。患者首先按腹痛病史进行随机分组,然后随机分配接受CO₂或空气充气。术后腹痛评分采用10分视觉模拟评分量表记录,显著疼痛定义为评分3分或更高。测量腹围和呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO₂)水平。记录手术期间和术后的并发症。
由于结肠镜检查后经历显著疼痛的儿童数量较少,我们在单变量分析中未发现CO₂和空气充气之间存在统计学显著差异。在调整基线疼痛后,我们发现多变量分析中,CO₂充气患者的疼痛明显低于空气充气患者(P = 0.03)。与疼痛相关的显著因素包括手术持续时间(P = 0.006)、腹痛病史(P = 0.002)和既往腹部手术史(P = 0.02)。CO₂充气与结肠镜检查后腹围减小相关(P = 0.002)。无论采用何种干预措施,女孩更易出现疼痛(P = 0.04)。
大多数儿童能够耐受内镜检查且无明显疼痛。我们的研究在单变量分析中未能有力地显示空气和CO₂之间的显著差异。然而,结肠镜检查期间CO₂充气可能会减轻术后腹痛。多变量分析中疼痛增加的显著因素包括结肠镜检查时间超过30分钟、腹痛病史和既往腹部手术史。