• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在地方流行地区和疫情地区之间对有限的口服霍乱疫苗供应进行优化分配。

Optimal allocation of the limited oral cholera vaccine supply between endemic and epidemic settings.

作者信息

Moore Sean M, Lessler Justin

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2015 Oct 6;12(111):20150703. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0703.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2015.0703
PMID:26423441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4614506/
Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently established a global stockpile of oral cholera vaccine (OCV) to be preferentially used in epidemic response (reactive campaigns) with any vaccine remaining after 1 year allocated to endemic settings. Hence, the number of cholera cases or deaths prevented in an endemic setting represents the minimum utility of these doses, and the optimal risk-averse response to any reactive vaccination request (i.e. the minimax strategy) is one that allocates the remaining doses between the requested epidemic response and endemic use in order to ensure that at least this minimum utility is achieved. Using mathematical models, we find that the best minimax strategy is to allocate the majority of doses to reactive campaigns, unless the request came late in the targeted epidemic. As vaccine supplies dwindle, the case for reactive use of the remaining doses grows stronger. Our analysis provides a lower bound for the amount of OCV to keep in reserve when responding to any request. These results provide a strategic context for the fulfilment of requests to the stockpile, and define allocation strategies that minimize the number of OCV doses that are allocated to suboptimal situations.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)最近建立了口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)全球储备库,优先用于疫情应对(反应性接种运动),一年后剩余的任何疫苗将分配到霍乱流行地区。因此,在霍乱流行地区预防的霍乱病例数或死亡数代表了这些剂量的最小效用,对任何反应性疫苗接种请求的最佳风险规避反应(即极小极大策略)是将剩余剂量在请求的疫情应对和流行地区使用之间进行分配,以确保至少实现这一最小效用。通过数学模型,我们发现最佳的极小极大策略是将大部分剂量分配给反应性接种运动,除非请求在目标疫情后期提出。随着疫苗供应减少,对剩余剂量进行反应性使用的理由变得更加充分。我们的分析为应对任何请求时应储备的口服霍乱疫苗数量提供了下限。这些结果为满足对储备库的请求提供了战略背景,并定义了分配策略,以尽量减少分配到次优情况的口服霍乱疫苗剂量数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/ea42ce7b97b5/rsif20150703-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/56e2e49a2018/rsif20150703-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/63c2ecf2c5cb/rsif20150703-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/982908a42711/rsif20150703-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/09a0c01fb6d9/rsif20150703-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/6cc071a09168/rsif20150703-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/7c1beabdb4eb/rsif20150703-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/fd66f5a508eb/rsif20150703-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/ea42ce7b97b5/rsif20150703-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/56e2e49a2018/rsif20150703-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/63c2ecf2c5cb/rsif20150703-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/982908a42711/rsif20150703-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/09a0c01fb6d9/rsif20150703-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/6cc071a09168/rsif20150703-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/7c1beabdb4eb/rsif20150703-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/fd66f5a508eb/rsif20150703-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1757/4614506/ea42ce7b97b5/rsif20150703-g8.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal allocation of the limited oral cholera vaccine supply between endemic and epidemic settings.在地方流行地区和疫情地区之间对有限的口服霍乱疫苗供应进行优化分配。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Oct 6;12(111):20150703. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0703.
2
Global oral cholera vaccine use, 2013-2018.全球口服霍乱疫苗使用情况,2013-2018 年。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):A132-A140. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.086. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
The Impact of a One-Dose versus Two-Dose Oral Cholera Vaccine Regimen in Outbreak Settings: A Modeling Study.单剂量与双剂量口服霍乱疫苗接种方案在疫情环境中的影响:一项建模研究
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 25;12(8):e1001867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001867. eCollection 2015 Aug.
4
Comprehensive Review on the Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) in Ethiopia: 2019 to 2023.埃塞俄比亚口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)使用情况的综合综述:2019 年至 2023 年。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 12;79(Supplement_1):S20-S32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae194.
5
Current and future cholera vaccines.当前和未来的霍乱疫苗。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1:A118-A126. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.011. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Lessons learnt from 12 oral cholera vaccine campaigns in resource-poor settings.在资源匮乏地区开展12次口服霍乱疫苗接种活动的经验教训。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Apr 1;95(4):303-312. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.175166. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Strategy, demand, management, and costs of an international cholera vaccine stockpile.国际霍乱疫苗储备的策略、需求、管理和成本。
J Infect Dis. 2013 Nov 1;208 Suppl 1:S15-22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit233.
8
A Quantitative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Oral Cholera Vaccine as a Reactive Measure in Cholera Outbreaks.口服霍乱疫苗作为霍乱疫情应对措施有效性的定量系统评价与荟萃分析
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):2-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007166. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Oral cholera vaccine delivery strategy in India: Routine or campaign?-A scoping review.印度口服霍乱疫苗接种策略:常规还是运动?——范围综述。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1:A184-A193. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.082. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
Considerations around the introduction of a cholera vaccine in Bangladesh.关于在孟加拉国引入霍乱疫苗的考量。
Vaccine. 2014 Dec 12;32(52):7033-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocation of Oral Cholera Vaccines in Africa.非洲口服霍乱疫苗的分配
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 14;13(5):519. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050519.
2
Cholera and diarrheal diseases in Cuamba District, Niassa Province, Mozambique: Systematic healthcare facility-based surveillance strengthening, characteristics of suspected cholera and diarrheal patients, and incidence of diarrheal diseases.莫桑比克尼亚萨省库安巴地区的霍乱和腹泻病:系统强化医疗机构为基础的监测、疑似霍乱和腹泻病患者的特征以及腹泻病发病率。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Apr 30;18(4):e0011843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011843. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Genomic epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae during a mass vaccination campaign of displaced communities in Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-licensure deployment of oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review.口服霍乱疫苗上市后应用:一项系统评价
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Dec 1;92(12):881-93. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.139949. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
2
First outbreak response using an oral cholera vaccine in Africa: vaccine coverage, acceptability and surveillance of adverse events, Guinea, 2012.非洲首次暴发疫情时使用口服霍乱疫苗:2012 年,几内亚的疫苗接种覆盖率、可接受性和不良反应监测。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Oct 17;7(10):e2465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002465. eCollection 2013.
3
5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
孟加拉国大规模流离失所者社区疫苗接种运动期间霍乱弧菌的基因组流行病学研究。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 24;14(1):3773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39415-3.
4
Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp: using a transmission model in public health practice.比较 Maela 难民营中替代霍乱疫苗接种策略:在公共卫生实践中使用传播模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):1075. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4688-6.
5
Cholera: an overview with reference to the Yemen epidemic.霍乱:概述及也门疫情参考。
Front Med. 2019 Apr;13(2):213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0631-2. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
6
Temperature modulates dengue virus epidemic growth rates through its effects on reproduction numbers and generation intervals.温度通过对繁殖数和世代间隔的影响来调节登革热病毒的流行增长率。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 19;11(7):e0005797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005797. eCollection 2017 Jul.
7
Model distinguishability and inference robustness in mechanisms of cholera transmission and loss of immunity.霍乱传播机制和免疫力丧失中的模型可区分性与推断稳健性
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:68-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
印度加尔各答两价口服霍乱全细胞疫苗 5 年有效性:一项集群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70273-1. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
4
Spatio-temporal dynamics of cholera during the first year of the epidemic in Haiti.海地疫情第一年霍乱的时空动态。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Apr 4;7(4):e2145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002145. Print 2013.
5
Urban cholera transmission hotspots and their implications for reactive vaccination: evidence from Bissau city, Guinea bissau.城市霍乱传播热点及其对反应性疫苗接种的影响:来自几内亚比绍比绍市的证据。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001901. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Stockpiling oral cholera vaccine.储存口服霍乱疫苗。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Oct 1;90(10):714. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.112433.
7
Cholera modeling: challenges to quantitative analysis and predicting the impact of interventions.霍乱建模:定量分析和预测干预措施影响的挑战。
Epidemiology. 2012 Jul;23(4):523-30. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182572581.
8
The global burden of cholera.霍乱的全球负担。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):209-218A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.093427. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
9
Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial.低成本灭活全细胞口服霍乱疫苗的有效性:一项随机对照试验 3 年随访结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Oct;5(10):e1289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
10
Safety and immunogenicity study of a killed bivalent (O1 and O139) whole-cell oral cholera vaccine Shanchol, in Bangladeshi adults and children as young as 1 year of age.沙克霍(Shanchol)二价(O1 和 O139)全细胞口服霍乱疫苗在孟加拉国成年人和 1 岁以下儿童中的安全性和免疫原性研究。
Vaccine. 2011 Oct 26;29(46):8285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.108. Epub 2011 Sep 9.