• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用日本乳腺癌学会的病理反应分类法对新辅助治疗后的结果进行分层。

Stratifying the outcome after neoadjuvant treatment using pathological response classification by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.

作者信息

Mukai Hirofumi, Arihiro Koji, Shimizu Chikako, Masuda Norikazu, Miyagi Yumi, Yamaguchi Takeshi, Yoshida Takashi

机构信息

Division of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.

Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2016 Jan;23(1):73-77. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0640-9. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-015-0640-9
PMID:26423822
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is one of the standard treatment for patients with operable and locally advanced breast cancer. Pathological response after NAC has been assessed according to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) classification in Japan. This classification that was first established in 1998 and revised in 2007 has been used in routine clinical practice in Japan. In the present study, we investigated whether the assessment of pathological response according to this classification could stratify the long-term outcome of patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2005 in 6 hospitals participating in this study were identified. Patients whose response was judged to be Grade 2 was reassessed into Grades 2a and 2b according to the updated JBCS classification revised in 2007. Then, the association of pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed.

RESULTS

635 patients received NAC and 154 relapses (24 %) were observed during a median follow-up of 41.5 months (range 4.2-69.5 months). There was a statistically significant difference in RFS among each pathological response. 5-year RFS of patients with Grade 3 without residual ductal carcinoma in situ was 94 %. 5-year RFS were 88 % in Grade 3, 95 % in Grade 2b, 80 % in Grade 2a, 73 % in Grade 1b, 67 % in Grade 1a, 59 % in Grade 0, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An outcome could be stratified by assessing tumor burden following NAC according to the JBCS classification.

摘要

背景

新辅助化疗(NAC)是可手术及局部晚期乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法之一。在日本,NAC后的病理反应是根据日本乳腺癌学会(JBCS)分类进行评估的。该分类于1998年首次制定,并于2007年修订,已在日本的常规临床实践中使用。在本研究中,我们调查了根据该分类评估病理反应是否可以对乳腺癌患者的长期预后进行分层。

方法

确定了2003年1月至2005年12月期间在参与本研究的6家医院接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者。根据2007年修订的最新JBCS分类,将反应被判定为2级的患者重新评估为2a级和2b级。然后,分析病理反应与无复发生存期(RFS)的关联。

结果

635例患者接受了NAC,在中位随访41.5个月(范围4.2 - 69.5个月)期间观察到154例复发(24%)。各病理反应之间的RFS存在统计学显著差异。3级且无残留导管原位癌患者的5年RFS为94%。3级患者的5年RFS分别为88%,2b级为95%,2a级为80%,1b级为73%,1a级为67%,0级为59%。

结论

根据JBCS分类评估NAC后的肿瘤负荷可以对预后进行分层。

相似文献

1
Stratifying the outcome after neoadjuvant treatment using pathological response classification by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.采用日本乳腺癌学会的病理反应分类法对新辅助治疗后的结果进行分层。
Breast Cancer. 2016 Jan;23(1):73-77. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0640-9. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
2
MRI staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: does tumor biology affect accuracy?乳腺癌新辅助化疗后 MRI 分期:肿瘤生物学是否影响准确性?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3149-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1912-z. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
3
Inter-observer agreement among pathologists in grading the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.病理学家在评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理反应中的观察者间一致性。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Jan;25(1):118-125. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0799-3. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to hormonal receptor status.根据激素受体状态,HER2过表达乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解情况。
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
[Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on histologic grade and expression of biological markers in breast cancer].[新辅助化疗对乳腺癌组织学分级及生物学标志物表达的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;31(11):858-62.
6
Impact of biomarker changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical response in patients with residual breast cancers.新辅助化疗期间生物标志物变化对残留乳腺癌患者临床反应的影响。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;21(2):254-261. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0897-1. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
7
The influence of breast cancer subtypes on the response to anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.乳腺癌亚型对局部晚期乳腺癌患者蒽环类新辅助化疗反应的影响。
J BUON. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):1273-1280.
8
Combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab improves pathologic complete response in patients with hormone receptor negative operable or locally advanced breast cancer.联合贝伐珠单抗的新辅助化疗可改善激素受体阴性可手术或局部晚期乳腺癌患者的病理完全缓解。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;38(1):74-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31828940c3.
9
Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Turkish patients.土耳其患者乳腺癌新辅助化疗的回顾性分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4119-23.
10
Circulating tumour cell enumeration does not correlate with Miller-Payne grade in a cohort of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.在接受新辅助化疗的一组乳腺癌患者中,循环肿瘤细胞计数与米勒-佩恩分级不相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):571-580. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05658-7. Epub 2020 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for pathological diagnosis of breast cancer, 2022 edition.日本乳腺癌学会《乳腺癌病理诊断临床实践指南(2022年版)》
Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan;31(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01518-6. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
Clinical Significance of ABCG2/BCRP Quantified by Fluorescent Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.荧光纳米颗粒定量检测ABCG2/BCRP在接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者中的临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;15(8):2365. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082365.
3
Development of multiple AI pipelines that predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response of breast cancer using H&E-stained tissues.
开发多个 AI 管道,使用 H&E 染色组织预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应。
J Pathol Clin Res. 2023 May;9(3):182-194. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.314. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
4
Olaparib and paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in treatment of ovarian cancer: influence on disease control.奥拉帕利与紫杉醇联合卡铂治疗卵巢癌:对疾病控制的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jan 15;14(1):468-475. eCollection 2022.
5
Pathologic method for extracting good prognosis group in triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后提取预后良好组的病理方法。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Apr;113(4):1507-1518. doi: 10.1111/cas.15273. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
Avoidance and Period-Shortening of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Stages I and II: Importance of Ki-67 Labeling Index and the Recognition of Apocrine-Type Lesions.避免和缩短 I 期和 II 期三阴性乳腺癌的新辅助化疗:Ki-67 标记指数的重要性和对大汗腺型病变的认识。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820943246. doi: 10.1177/1533033820943246.
7
Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of "pCR" from the prognostic standpoint.胰腺癌术前治疗后伴有或不伴有残留导管内癌成分的病理完全缓解(pCR):从预后角度重新审视“pCR”的定义。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Sep 20;3(6):676-685. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12288. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8
Prediction of survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and residual cancer burden.通过评估肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞和残余癌负荷预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的生存。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3927-8.