Olbrich Neto Jaime, Olbrich Sandra Regina Leite Rosa, Mori Natália Leite Rosa, Oliveira Ana Elisa de, Corrente José Eduardo
Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Department of Nursing, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar-Apr;82(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
Nasal hygiene with saline solutions has been shown to relieve congestion, reduce the thickening of the mucus and keep nasal cavity clean and moist.
Evaluating whether saline solutions improve nasal inspiratory flow among healthy children.
Students between 8 and 11 years of age underwent 6 procedures with saline solutions at different concentrations. The peak nasal inspiratory flow was measured before and 30 min after each procedure. Statistical analysis was performed by means of t test, analysis of variance, and Tukey's test, considering p<0.05.
We evaluated 124 children at all stages. There were differences on the way a same concentration was used. There was no difference between 0.9% saline solution and 3% saline solution by using a syringe.
The 3% saline solution had higher averages of peak nasal inspiratory flow, but it was not significantly higher than the 0.9% saline solution. It is important to offer various options to patients.
使用盐溶液进行鼻腔卫生护理已被证明可缓解鼻塞、减少黏液增厚并保持鼻腔清洁湿润。
评估盐溶液是否能改善健康儿童的鼻腔吸气流量。
8至11岁的学生接受了6次不同浓度盐溶液的操作。在每次操作前和操作后30分钟测量鼻腔吸气峰值流量。采用t检验、方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计分析，p值小于0.05。
我们在所有阶段评估了124名儿童。使用相同浓度的方式存在差异。使用注射器时，0.9%盐溶液和3%盐溶液之间没有差异。
3%盐溶液的鼻腔吸气峰值流量平均值较高，但并不显著高于0.9%盐溶液。为患者提供多种选择很重要。
