• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对污染性、高风险腹侧疝修补术的两阶段方法。

A dual-stage approach to contaminated, high-risk ventral hernia repairs.

作者信息

Kugler Nathan W, Bobbs Melanie, Webb Travis, Carver Thomas W, Milia David, Paul Jasmeet S

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.065. Epub 2016 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.065
PMID:27451887
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Modified Hernia Grading System (MHGS) was developed to risk stratify complex ventral hernia repairs (VHRs). MHGS grade 3 patients have mesh infections, dirty or contaminated fields, and/or violation of the alimentary tract. Reported surgical site infection (SSI) rates are over 40% after single-stage VHR in contaminated fields. In an attempt to decrease the SSI rate in MHGS grade 3 patients, we developed a dual-stage VHR (DSVHR) approach.

METHODS

We reviewed adult general surgery patients undergoing DSVHR between January 2010 and June 2014. All patients were MHGS grade 3. Primary end point was 30-d superficial and deep SSI. Secondary end points included other surgical site occurrences, 6-mo recurrence, and mesh excision rates.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent DSVHR. Mean age was 56 y, and median body mass index was 38.3 kg/m(2). Operative indication included enterocutaneous fistulas (ECF; n = 6), ECF with infected mesh (n = 2), infected mesh (n = 2), and VHR requiring bowel resection (n = 5). Thirty-one operative procedures were performed with median of 2.5 d between procedures. Fascial closure was re-established in 12 patients; five patients had underlay biologic mesh placement; seven underwent component separation with retrorectus mesh placement (synthetic [n = 2], biologic [n = 5]). The remaining patients underwent bridging repair with biologic mesh. One patient developed a recurrence after 6 mo, whereas a single patient had a recurrence of their ECF. Four (27%) patients developed a SSI, with an additional four (27%) experiencing a surgical site occurrence. There were no postoperative mesh infections.

CONCLUSIONS

DSVHR in MHGS grade 3 patients is associated with a lower SSI rate than previously reported for those undergoing single-stage repairs.

摘要

背景

改良疝分级系统(MHGS)用于对复杂腹疝修补术(VHR)进行风险分层。MHGS 3级患者存在网片感染、术野污染或污秽以及/或者消化道破损情况。据报道,在污染术野进行单阶段VHR后手术部位感染(SSI)率超过40%。为降低MHGS 3级患者的SSI率,我们研发了双阶段VHR(DSVHR)方法。

方法

我们回顾了2010年1月至2014年6月期间接受DSVHR的成年普通外科患者。所有患者均为MHGS 3级。主要终点为30天浅表和深部SSI。次要终点包括其他手术部位事件、6个月复发率和网片切除率。

结果

15例患者接受了DSVHR。平均年龄为56岁,中位体重指数为38.3kg/m²。手术指征包括肠皮肤瘘(ECF;n = 6)、伴有感染网片的ECF(n = 2)、感染网片(n = 2)以及需要肠切除的VHR(n = 5)。共进行了31次手术操作,两次手术之间的中位间隔时间为2.5天。12例患者重新建立了筋膜闭合;5例患者进行了补片植入;7例患者进行了腹直肌后补片植入的成分分离术(合成补片[n = 2],生物补片[n = 5])。其余患者采用生物补片进行桥接修复。1例患者在6个月后出现复发,而1例患者的ECF复发。4例(2

相似文献

1
A dual-stage approach to contaminated, high-risk ventral hernia repairs.一种针对污染性、高风险腹侧疝修补术的两阶段方法。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.065. Epub 2016 May 6.
2
Suture, synthetic, or biologic in contaminated ventral hernia repair.在污染性腹疝修补术中使用的合成或生物缝线。
J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs.污染性腹疝修补中合成网片的治疗效果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):991-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.382. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
4
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
5
Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs.污染性疝修补术中生物补片与合成补片效果的对比分析。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):828-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.使用生物合成可吸收补片修复污染性腹疝后复发、手术部位感染及生活质量的多中心、前瞻性、纵向研究:COBRA研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):205-211. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001601.
7
A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.利用生物补片进行一期修复感染和污染的腹壁缺损的 5 年临床经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):991-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182849871.
8
Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair.开放腹疝修补术中的腹膜前修补法与腹膜下修补法对比
J Surg Res. 2016 May 1;202(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Large Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Component Separation Technique with Synthetic Mesh.采用合成补片的组织分离技术修复大型污染性腹疝
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec;136(6):796e-805e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001793.
10
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:一期筋膜闭合与桥接修补的风险调整比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Staged abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of complex gastrointestinal reconstruction.复杂胃肠道重建情况下的分期腹壁重建。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02856-2. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.生物补片与合成补片用于美国疾病控制与预防中心3级和4级开放性腹壁重建的效果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09486-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Management of ventral hernia defect during enterocutaneous fistula takedown: practice patterns and short-term outcomes from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative.
肠外瘘关闭术中处理腹侧疝缺损的管理:来自腹部核心健康质量协作组的实践模式和短期结果。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1013-1020. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02347-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Anastomotic Leakage After Stoma Reversal Combined with Incisional Hernia Repair.造口回纳联合切口疝修补术后的吻合口漏
World J Surg. 2019 Apr;43(4):988-997. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4866-5.
5
A post-market, prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical investigation of Phasix™ mesh for VHWG grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair: a research protocol.一项关于用于VHWG 3级中线切口疝修补的Phasix™补片的上市后、前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床研究:研究方案
BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0439-7.