Saltukoglu Deniz, Grünewald Julian, Strohmeyer Nico, Bensch Robert, Ulbrich Maximilian H, Ronneberger Olaf, Simons Matias
Center for Systems Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany Renal Division, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Center for Systems Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany Renal Division, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Dec 1;26(24):4373-86. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-12-1580. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
It has long been known that electrical fields (EFs) are able to influence the direction of migrating cells, a process commonly referred to as electrotaxis or galvanotaxis. Most studies have focused on migrating cells equipped with an existing polarity before EF application, making it difficult to delineate EF-specific pathways. Here we study the initial events in front-rear organization of spreading keratinocytes to dissect the molecular requirements for random and EF-controlled polarization. We find that Arp2/3-dependent protrusive forces and Rac1/Cdc42 activity were generally required for both forms of polarization but were dispensable for controlling the direction of EF-controlled polarization. By contrast, we found a crucial role for extracellular pH as well as G protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) or purinergic signaling in the control of directionality. The normal direction of polarization toward the cathode was reverted by lowering extracellular pH. Polarization toward the anode was also seen at neutral pH when GPCR or purinergic signaling was inhibited. However, the stepwise increase of extracellular pH in this scenario led to restoration of cathodal polarization. Overall our work puts forward a model in which the EF uses distinct polarization pathways. The cathodal pathway involves GPCR/purinergic signaling and is dominant over the anodal pathway at neutral pH.
长期以来,人们都知道电场(EFs)能够影响迁移细胞的方向,这一过程通常被称为电趋化或电流趋化。大多数研究都集中在施加电场之前就已具备现有极性的迁移细胞上,这使得难以描绘电场特异性途径。在这里,我们研究了正在铺展的角质形成细胞前后组织中的初始事件,以剖析随机极化和电场控制极化的分子需求。我们发现,Arp2/3依赖性的突出力和Rac1/Cdc42活性通常是两种极化形式所必需的,但对于控制电场控制极化的方向则是可有可无的。相比之下,我们发现细胞外pH以及G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)或嘌呤能信号在方向性控制中起着关键作用。通过降低细胞外pH,朝向阴极的正常极化方向会反转。当GPCR或嘌呤能信号被抑制时,在中性pH下也会出现朝向阳极的极化。然而,在这种情况下,细胞外pH的逐步增加会导致阴极极化的恢复。总体而言,我们的工作提出了一个模型,其中电场使用不同的极化途径。阴极途径涉及GPCR/嘌呤能信号,并且在中性pH下比阳极途径占主导地位。